TitleDocosahexaenoic acid blocks progression of western diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in obese Ldlr-/- mice.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsLytle KA, Wong CP, Jump DB
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue4
Paginatione0173376
Date Published2017
ISSN1932-6203
KeywordsAnimals, Collagen Type I, Diet, Western, Dietary Fats, Disease Models, Animal, Disease Progression, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Growth Differentiation Factor 15, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Olive Oil, Osteopontin, Protein-Lysine 6-Oxidase, Receptors, LDL, Thrombospondins
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major public health concern in western societies. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of NAFLD, is characterized by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis. NASH is a risk factor for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NASH is predicted to be the leading cause of liver transplants by 2020. Despite this growing public health concern, there remain no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved NASH treatments. Using Ldlr -/- mice as a preclinical model of western diet (WD)-induced NASH, we previously established that dietary supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6,ω3) attenuated WD-induced NASH in a prevention study. Herein, we evaluated the capacity of DHA supplementation of the WD and a low fat diet to fully reverse NASH in mice with pre-existing disease.

METHODS: Ldlr -/- mice fed the WD for 22 wks developed metabolic syndrome (MetS) and a severe NASH phenotype, including obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis and low hepatic polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content. These mice were randomized to 5 groups: a baseline group (WDB, sacrificed at 22 wks) and 4 treatments: 1) WD + olive oil (WDO); 2) WD + DHA (WDD); 3) returned to chow + olive oil (WDChO); or 4) returned to chow + DHA (WDChD). The four treatment groups were maintained on their respective diets for 8 wks. An additional group was maintained on standard laboratory chow (Reference Diet, RD) for the 30-wk duration of the study.

RESULTS: When compared to the WDB group, the WDO group displayed increased hepatic expression of genes linked to inflammation (Opn, Il1rn, Gdf15), hepatic fibrosis (collagen staining, Col1A1, Thbs2, Lox) reflecting disease progression. Mice in the WDD group, in contrast, had increased hepatic C20-22 ω3 PUFA and no evidence of NASH progression. MetS and NASH markers in the WDChO or WDChD groups were significantly attenuated and marginally different from the RD group, reflecting disease remission.

CONCLUSION: While these studies establish that DHA supplementation of the WD blocks WD-induced NASH progression, DHA alone does not promote full remission of diet-induced MetS or NASH.

DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0173376
Alternate JournalPLoS ONE
PubMed ID28422962
PubMed Central IDPMC5396882