• Dietary fiber is a diverse group of compounds, including lignin and complex carbohydrates, which cannot be digested by human enzymes in the small intestine. (More information)
  • Although each class of fiber is chemically unique, scientists have tried to classify fibers on the basis of their solubility, viscosity, and fermentability in order to better understand their physiological effects. (More information)
  • Viscous fibers, such as those found in oat products and legumes, can lower serum LDL cholesterol levels and normalize blood glucose and insulin responses. (More information)
  • High-fiber intakes promote bowel health by preventing constipation and diverticular disease. (More information)
  • Large prospective cohort studies provide strong and consistent evidence that diets rich in fiber from whole grains, legumes, fruit, and nonstarchy vegetables can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. (More information)
  • Although the results of case-control studies suggested that colorectal cancer was more prevalent in people with low-fiber intakes, more recent findings from large prospective cohort studies and four clinical intervention trials do not support an association between fiber intake and the risk of colorectal cancer. (More information)
  • Observational studies on dietary fiber intake and breast cancer incidence have reported inconsistent findings. (More information)
  • Numerous controlled clinical trials in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have found that increasing fiber intake improves blood glucose (glycemic) control and serum lipid profiles. (More information)
  • In 2001, the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine established an Adequate Intake (AI) recommendation for total daily fiber intake. For adults who are 50 years of age and younger, the AI recommendation for total fiber intake is 38 g/day for men and 25 g/day for women. For adults over 50 years of age, the recommendation is 30 g/day for men and 21 g/day for women. (More information)


All dietary fibers are resistant to digestion in the small intestine, meaning they arrive at the colon intact (1). Although most fibers are carbohydrates, one important factor that determines their susceptibility to digestion by human enzymes is the conformation of the chemical bonds between sugar molecules (glycosidic bonds). Humans lack digestive enzymes capable of hydrolyzing (breaking apart) most β-glycosidic bonds, which explains why amylose, a glucose polymer with α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, is digestible by human enzymes, while cellulose, a glucose polymer with β-1,4 glycosidic bonds, is indigestible ( Figure 1).

Figure 1. Chemical Structures of Amylose (alpha-1,4 glucosidic bonds), Cellulose (beta-1,4 glucosidic bonds), and Beta-Glucans (mixed beta-1,3 and beta-1,4 glucosidic bonds).

Definitions of Fiber

Although nutritional scientists and clinicians generally agree that a healthful diet should include plenty of fiber-rich foods, agreement on the actual definition of fiber has been more difficult to achieve (2-4). In the 1970s, dietary fiber was defined as remnants of plant cells that are resistant to digestion by human enzymes (5). This definition includes a component of some plant cell walls called lignin, as well as indigestible carbohydrates found in plants. However, this definition omits indigestible carbohydrates derived from animal sources (e.g., chitin) and synthetic (e.g., fructooligosaccharides) and digestible carbohydrates that are inaccessible to human digestive enzymes (e.g., resistant starch) (6). These compounds share many of the characteristics of fiber present in plant foods.

Institute of Medicine: dietary, functional, and total fiber

Before establishing intake recommendations for fiber in 2001, a panel of experts convened by the Institute of Medicine developed definitions of fiber that made a distinction between fiber that occurs naturally in plant foods (dietary fiber) and isolated or synthetic fibers that may be added to foods or used as dietary supplements (functional fiber) (4). However, these distinctions are controversial, and there are other classification systems for dietary fiber (see Other classification systems).

Dietary fiber
  • Lignin: Lignin is not a carbohydrate; rather, it is a polyphenolic compound with a complex three-dimensional structure that is found in the cell walls of woody plants and seeds (7).
  • Cellulose: Cellulose is a glucose polymer with β-1,4 glycosidic bonds found in all plant cell walls (see Figure 1  above) (6).
  • β-Glucans: β-glucans are glucose polymers with a mixture of β-1,4 glycosidic bonds and β-1,3 glycosidic bonds (see Figure 1  above). Oats and barley are particularly rich in β-glucans (7).
  • Hemicelluloses: Hemicelluloses are a diverse group of polysaccharides (sugar polymers) containing six-carbon sugars (hexoses) and five-carbon sugars (pentoses) (6). Like cellulose, hemicelluloses are found in plant cell walls.
  • Pectins: Pectins are viscous polysaccharides that are particularly abundant in fruit and berries (4).
  • Gums: Gums are viscous polysaccharides often found in seeds (4).
  • Inulin and oligofructose: Inulin is a mixture of fructose chains that vary in length and often terminate with a glucose molecule (8). Oligofructose is a mixture of shorter fructose chains that may terminate in glucose or fructose. Inulin and oligofructose occur naturally in plants, such as onions and Jerusalem artichokes.
  • Resistant starch: Naturally occurring resistant starch is sequestered in plant cell walls and is therefore inaccessible to human digestive enzymes (4). Bananas and legumes are sources of naturally occurring resistant starch. Resistant starch may also be formed by food processing or by cooling and reheating.
Functional fiber

According to the Institute of Medicine’s definition, functional fiber “consists of isolated, nondigestible carbohydrates that have beneficial physiological effects in humans (4).” Functional fibers may be nondigestible carbohydrates that have been isolated or extracted from a natural plant or animal source, or they may be manufactured or synthesized. However, designation as a functional fiber by the Institute of Medicine requires the presentation of sufficient evidence of physiological benefit in humans. Fibers identified as potential functional fibers by the Institute of Medicine include:

  • Isolated or extracted forms of the dietary fibers listed above.
  • Psyllium: Psyllium refers to viscous mucilage, which is isolated from the husks of psyllium seeds. The husks are usually isolated from the seeds of Plantago ovata or blond psyllium. Psyllium is also known as ispaghula husk (4).
  • Chitin and chitosan: Chitin is a nondigestible carbohydrate extracted from the exoskeletons of crustaceans, such as crabs and lobsters. It is a long polymer of acetylated glucosamine units linked by β-1,4 glycosidic bonds. Deacetylation of chitin is used to produce chitosan, a nondigestible glucosamine polymer (9).
  • Fructooligosaccharides: Fructooligosaccharides are short, synthetic fructose chains terminating with a glucose unit. They are used as food additives (8).
  • Polydextrose and polyols: Polydextrose and polyols are synthetic polysaccharides used as bulking agents and sugar substitutes in foods (4).
  • Resistant dextrins: Resistant dextrins, also called resistant maltodextrins, are indigestible polysaccharides formed when starch is heated and treated with enzymes. They are used as food additives (4).
Total fiber

Total fiber is defined by the Institute of Medicine as “the sum of dietary fiber and functional fiber (4).”

Other classification systems

Viscous and nonviscous fiber

Some fibers form very viscous solutions or gels in water. This property is linked to the ability of some fibers to slow the emptying of the stomach, delay the absorption of some nutrients in the small intestine, and lower serum cholesterol. Viscous fibers include pectins, β-glucans, some gums (e.g., guar gum), and mucilages (e.g., psyllium). Cellulose, lignin, and some hemicelluloses are nonviscous fibers (6, 7).

Fermentable and nonfermentable fiber

Some fibers are readily fermented by bacteria that normally colonize the colon. In addition to increasing the amount of bacteria in the colon, fermentation results in the formation of short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) and gases (1). Short-chain fatty acids can be absorbed and metabolized to produce energy. Interestingly, the preferred energy source for colonocytes (epithelial cells that line the colon) is butyrate. Pectins, β-glucans, guar gum, inulin, and oligofructose are readily fermented, while cellulose and lignin are resistant to fermentation in the colon (6, 7). Foods that are rich in fermentable fibers include oats and barley, as well as fruit and vegetables. Cereal fibers that are rich in cellulose, such as wheat bran, are relatively resistant to bacterial fermentation (1).

Soluble and insoluble fiber

"Soluble fiber" originated as an analytical term (10). Soluble fibers are dispersible in water, while insoluble fibers are not. Originally, the solubility of fiber was thought to predict its physiological effects. For example, it was thought that soluble fibers were more likely to form viscous gels and were more easily fermented by colonic bacteria. Further research has revealed that solubility does not reliably predict the physiological effects of fiber. However, the terms “soluble” and “insoluble” fiber are still used by many nutrition and health care professionals, as well as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for nutrition labeling. β-Glucans, gums, mucilages (e.g., psyllium), pectins, and some hemicelluloses are soluble fibers, while cellulose, lignin, some pectins, and some hemicelluloses are insoluble fibers (10). Oat products and legumes (dry beans, peas, and lentils) are rich sources of soluble fiber.

Biological Activities

Lowering serum cholesterol

Numerous controlled clinical trials have found that increasing the intake of viscous dietary fibers, particularly from legumes (dry beans, peas, and lentils) (11-13) and oat products (14-19), decreases serum total and LDL cholesterol. Such findings led the FDA to approve health claims like the following on labels of foods containing at least 0.75 g/serving of soluble fiber from whole oats: “Soluble fiber from foods such as oat bran, as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of heart disease” (20). Supplementation with viscous fibers, such as pectin, guar gum, and psyllium, has also been found to decrease total and LDL cholesterol levels when compared to low-fiber placebos (17, 21-26). Although many of these studies examined relatively high-fiber intakes, a meta-analysis that combined the results of 67 controlled trials found that even a modest 10-g per day increase in viscous fiber intake resulted in reductions in LDL-cholesterol averaging 22 mg/dL (0.57 mmol/L) and reductions in total cholesterol averaging 17 mg/dL (0.45 mmol/L) (17).

Lowering postprandial glycemia (blood sugar)

The addition of viscous dietary fiber (27, 28) and isolated viscous fibers (29-32) to a carbohydrate-containing meal has been found to result in significant improvements in blood glucose and insulin responses in numerous controlled clinical trials (33). Large, rapid increases in blood glucose levels are potent signals to the β-cells of the pancreas to increase insulin secretion. Over time, recurrent elevations in blood glucose and excessive insulin secretion are thought to increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), as well as cardiovascular disease (see Disease Prevention). When the carbohydrate content of two meals is equal, the presence of fiber, particularly viscous fiber, generally results in smaller but more sustained increases in blood glucose and thus significantly lower insulin levels (33).

Softening stool

Increasing intakes of dietary fibers and fiber supplements can prevent or ameliorate constipation by softening and adding bulk to stool and by speeding its passage through the colon (34). Wheat bran and fruit and vegetables are the fiber sources that have been most consistently found to increase stool bulk and shorten transit time (35). Fiber supplements that have been found to be effective in treating constipation include cellulose and psyllium (4). Sufficient fluid intake is also required to maximize the stool-softening effect of increased fiber intake (36). In addition to increasing fiber intake, drinking at least 64 ounces (~2 liters or 2 quarts) of fluid daily is usually recommended to help prevent and treat constipation (37).

Disease Prevention

Observational studies that have identified associations between high-fiber intakes and reductions in chronic disease risk have generally assessed only fiber-rich foods, rather than fiber itself, making it difficult to determine whether observed benefits are related to fiber or other nutrients and phytochemicals commonly found in fiber-rich foods. In contrast, intervention trials often use isolated fibers to determine whether a specific fiber component has beneficial health effects.

Cardiovascular disease

Prospective cohort studies have consistently found that high intakes of fiber-rich foods are associated with significant reductions in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk (38-48) and cardiovascular-related mortality (48-51). A pooled analysis of ten prospective cohort studies of dietary fiber intake in the US and Europe found that each 10 g/day increase in total dietary fiber intake was associated with a 14% decrease in the risk of coronary events, such as myocardial infarction (MI), and a 24% decrease in deaths from CHD (51). This inverse association between fiber intake and CHD death was particularly high for cereal fiber and fruit fiber. Three large prospective cohort studies (42, 43, 45) found that dietary fiber intakes of approximately 14 g per 1,000 kcal of energy were associated with substantial (16%-33%) decreases in the risk of CHD; these results are the basis for the Institute of Medicine’s Adequate Intake (AI) recommendation for fiber (see Intake Recommendations) (4).

Although the cholesterol-lowering effect of viscous dietary fibers and fiber supplements probably contributes to the cardioprotective effects of dietary fiber (see Lowering serum cholesterol), other mechanisms are likely to play a role. Beneficial effects of fiber consumption on blood glucose and insulin responses may also contribute to observed reductions in CHD risk (52). Low-fiber, high-glycemic load diets are associated with higher serum triglyceride levels and lower HDL cholesterol levels, two risk factors for cardiovascular disease (53, 54). Fiber-rich diets that are rich in certain micronutrients like magnesium and potassium may also help lower blood pressure, another important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Some observational studies have found inverse associations between dietary fiber intake and blood pressure (55) or hypertension (56). A meta-analysis of 24 randomized, placebo-controlled trials found that dietary fiber supplementation (average of 11.5 g/day) lowered systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 1.13 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 1.26 mm Hg (57). Similarly, another meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials found that an increase in dietary fiber (median increase of 10.7 g/day compared to the control group) was associated with a 1.15 mm Hg reduction in SBP and a 1.65 mm Hg reduction in DBP (58). Both analyses reported that the reductions in DBP, but not SBP, were statistically significant. Additionally, recent studies have indicated that higher consumption of dietary fiber may lower levels of C-reactive protein (59, 60), a biomarker of inflammation that is strongly associated with the risk of cardiovascular events, such as MI and stroke (61). Thus, several mechanisms might contribute to the cardioprotective effect of dietary fiber. Although viscous dietary fibers and fiber supplements appear to be most effective in lowering LDL-cholesterol levels, large epidemiological studies provide strong and consistent evidence that diets rich in all fiber from whole grains, legumes, fruit, and nonstarchy vegetables can significantly reduce CHD risk (62).

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Increasing intakes of refined carbohydrates and decreasing intakes of fiber in the US have paralleled the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) to near epidemic proportions (63). Numerous prospective cohort studies have found that that diets rich in fiber, particularly cereal fiber from whole grains, are associated with significant reductions in the risk of developing type 2 DM (64-74). Although no intervention trials have evaluated the effect of increasing dietary fiber intake alone on type 2 DM prevention, two important intervention trials found that a combination of lifestyle modifications that included increasing fiber intake decreased the risk of developing type 2 DM in adults with impaired glucose tolerance (75, 76). Although multiple factors, including obesity, inactivity, and genetics, increase the risk of developing type 2 DM, the results of observational studies and intervention trials indicate that fiber-rich diets improve glucose tolerance and decrease the risk of type 2 DM, particularly in high-risk individuals.


Colorectal cancer

The majority of case-control studies conducted prior to 1990 found the incidence of colorectal cancer was lower in people with higher fiber intakes (77, 78). A recent nested case-control study found an inverse association between dietary fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer when fiber intake was assessed by food diaries but not when assessed by food-frequency questionnaires (79). To date, most prospective cohort studies have not found significant associations between measures of dietary fiber intake and colorectal cancer risk (80-89). A pooled analysis of 13 prospective cohort studies, which analyzed data from 725,628 adults, did not find high dietary fiber intake to be protective against colorectal cancer when other dietary factors were taken into account (90). However, the largest prospective study on diet and cancer to date, which included 519,978 men and women participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) project, found that dietary fiber from foods was protective against colon cancer development (91). This EPIC study was not included in the earlier pooled analysis mentioned above that reported no association between dietary fiber intake and colorectal cancer (90).

In addition, four controlled clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a protective effect of fiber consumption on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas (precancerous polyps). The rate of recurrence of colorectal adenomas over a 4-year period was not significantly different between those who consumed about 33 g/day of fiber from a fruit and vegetable-rich, low-fat diet and those in a control group who consumed about 19 g/day of fiber (92). In another trial, there was no significant difference in the rate of colorectal adenoma recurrence over a 3-year period between those supplemented with 13.5 g/day of wheat-bran fiber and those supplemented with 2 g/day of wheat-bran fiber (93). More recently, a 4-year intervention trial found that supplementation with 7.5 g/day of wheat bran had no effect on colorectal adenoma recurrence (94). Surprisingly, in another intervention trial, supplementation with 3.5 g/day of psyllium for three years resulted in a significant increase in adenoma recurrence compared to placebo (95).

The reasons for the discrepancies between the findings of case-control studies with those of most prospective cohort studies and recent intervention trials have generated considerable debate among scientists. Potential reasons for the lack of a protective effect by dietary fiber observed in these studies include the possibility that the type or the amount of fiber consumed by most people in these studies was inadequate to prevent colorectal cancer (4), or that other dietary factors like fat may interact with fiber, influencing its effects on colorectal cancer (1, 96). The methods used to assess fiber intake in observational studies may also contribute to the disparate results (79). Clearly, more research is needed to sort out the complex effects of dietary fiber and fiber supplements on colorectal cancer risk and progression.

Breast cancer

A number of early case-control studies found significant inverse associations between dietary fiber intake and breast cancer incidence (97-100), but many prospective cohort studies have not found dietary fiber intake to be associated with significant reductions in breast cancer risk (101-108). Three studies have reported a protective effect of dietary fiber on breast cancer risk. A prospective cohort study in the UK found that dietary fiber intake was inversely associated with risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women but not in postmenopausal women (109). Additionally, a prospective cohort study in Sweden found that postmenopausal women with the highest fiber intakes (averaging about 26 g/day) had a risk of breast cancer that was 40% lower than women with the lowest fiber intakes (averaging about 13 g/day) (110). Women with the highest fiber and lowest fat intakes had the very lowest risk of breast cancer. More recently, a prospective study in a cohort of more than 185,000 US postmenopausal women found that those with the highest intakes of dietary fiber (median, 26 g/day) had a 13% lower risk of all forms of breast cancer and a 44% lower risk of hormone receptor-negative tumors (ER-/PR-) compared to those with the lowest intakes of dietary fiber (median, 11 g/day) (111). A 2011 meta-analysis of ten prospective cohort studies found a modest, 11% lower risk of breast cancer in women with the highest intakes of dietary fiber (112). The results of small, short-term intervention trials in premenopausal and postmenopausal women suggest that low-fat (10%-25% of energy), high-fiber (25-40 g/day) diets could decrease circulating estrogen levels by increasing the excretion of estrogens and by promoting the metabolism of estrogens to less estrogenic forms (113, 114). However, it is not known whether fiber-associated effects on endogenous estrogen levels have a clinically significant impact on breast cancer risk (4). Overall, observational studies examining dietary fiber intake and breast cancer incidence have reported mixed results. In such studies, it is possible that the association may be confounded by consumption of fiber-rich foods, such as fruit and vegetables.

Diverticular disease

Some observational studies have associated high-fiber intakes with a decreased risk of diverticulosis, a relatively common condition that is characterized by the formation of small pouches (diverticula) in the colon (115, 116). However, a recent cross-sectional study of 2,104 adults, found that those with the highest fiber intakes, measured by food frequency questionnaires, had a higher prevalence of diverticula (assessed by colonoscopy) compared to those with the lowest fiber intakes (117). Although most people with diverticulosis experience no symptoms, about 15%-20% may develop pain or inflammation, known as diverticulitis (118). In a large prospective cohort study, men with the highest insoluble fiber intakes (median, 22.7 g/day) had a 37% lower risk of developing symptomatic diverticular disease compared to men with the lowest insoluble fiber intakes (median, 10.1 g/day). The protective effect of dietary fiber against diverticular disease was strongest for cellulose and lignin (119). More research is needed to clarify the association between dietary fiber and diverticular disease.

Weight control

In addition to providing less energy, there is some evidence that higher fiber intakes can help to prevent weight gain or promote weight loss by extending the feeling of fullness after a meal (satiety) (120). Observational studies have found that adults with higher intakes of dietary fiber are leaner (121, 122) and less likely to be obese than adults with low-fiber intakes (123, 124). One large prospective cohort study found that women whose intake of high-fiber foods increased by an average of 9 g/day over a 12-year period were half as likely to experience a major weight gain of at least 55 lb (25 kg) than those whose intake of high-fiber foods decreased by an average of 3 g/day (125). The results of short-term clinical trials examining the effect of increased fiber intake on weight loss have been mixed. Overall, a systematic review of clinical trials conducted prior to 2001 found that increasing fiber intake from foods or supplements by 14 g/day resulted in a 10% decrease in energy intake and weight losses averaging about 4 1b (1.9 kg) over four months (120). However, some more recent clinical trials did not find fiber-rich cereal (126) or fiber supplements (127) enhanced weight loss. A 2011 systematic review of 61 randomized controlled trials examined the effect of different fiber types on body weight (128). This analysis found that dextrins and marine polysaccharides reduced body weight in all of the studies, while chitosan, arabinoxylans, and fructans reduced body weight in at least two-thirds of the studies. Average weight reductions were greatest for the fructans and marine polysaccharides groups (~1.3 kg or 2.8 lb/4 weeks for a 79 kg person in both groups). For all fiber types combined, the average weight reduction was only 0.3 g (0.7 lb) per 4 weeks for a 79-kg person (128). Although people with higher intakes of fiber-rich foods, particularly whole grains, appear more likely to maintain a healthy body weight, the role of fiber alone in long-term weight control is not yet clear. Effects on body weight might depend on the specific type of dietary fiber.

All-cause mortality

Several prospective cohort studies have found higher intakes of dietary fiber to be associated with a lower risk of mortality from all causes. A recent report from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, which followed 388,122 older adults for an average of nine years, found that men and women in the highest quintiles of dietary fiber intake had a 22% lower risk of mortality when compared to the lowest quintiles of dietary fiber intake (50). Smaller prospective studies have also reported an inverse association between total fiber intake and all-cause mortality (44, 48, 129), and an inverse association between cereal fiber intake and all-cause mortality was found in the Nurses’ Health Study, which included more than 50,000 participants (130). However, no association was found between total fiber intake or soluble fiber intake and mortality from all causes in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study—a prospective study that assessed fiber intake by a single, 24-hour dietary recall method (46).

Disease Treatment

Diabetes mellitus

Numerous controlled clinical trials in people who have type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) have found that increasing fiber intake from foods (131, 132) or viscous fiber supplements (133-135) improves markers of glycemic control, particularly postprandial glucose levels and serum lipid profiles. A meta-analysis that combined the results of 23 clinical trials comparing the effects of high-fiber diets (>20 g/1,000 kcal) with those of low-fiber diets (<10 g/1,000 kcal) in diabetic patients found that high-fiber diets lowered postprandial blood glucose concentrations by 13%-21%, serum LDL cholesterol concentrations by 8%-16%, and serum triglyceride concentrations by 8%-13% (136). Based on the evidence from this meta-analysis, the authors recommended a dietary fiber intake of 25-50 g/day (15-25 g/1,000 kcal) for individuals with diabetes, which is consistent with the recommendations of many international diabetes organizations of at least 25-35 g/day (137-139). In general, the results of controlled clinical trials support recommendations that people with diabetes aim for high-fiber intakes by increasing consumption of whole grains, legumes, nuts, fruit, and nonstarchy vegetables. Since there is little evidence from clinical trials that increasing nonviscous fiber alone is beneficial (140), individuals with diabetes should avoid increasing fiber intake exclusively from nonviscous sources, such as wheat bran (136).

Irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disorder of the intestines, characterized by episodes of abdominal pain or discomfort associated with a change in bowel movements, such as constipation or diarrhea (141). Although people diagnosed with IBS are often encouraged by health care providers to increase dietary fiber intake, the results of controlled clinical trials of psyllium, methylcellulose, and wheat bran have been mixed (142-144). A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found a beneficial effect of fiber that was limited to ispaghula husk (psyllium) (143). More recently, a 3-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 275 patients with IBS found that supplementation with psyllium (10 g/day) improved symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort in the first two months of supplementation and also improved symptom severity after three months’ supplementation (145). Compared to placebo, supplementation with insoluble bran fiber (10 g/day) improved abdominal pain or discomfort only after three months’ supplementation and had no effect on symptom severity (145). Additionally, a systematic review of 17 RCTs of fiber supplements in IBS patients found that supplementation with soluble fiber, mainly from psyllium, significantly improved a global measure of IBS symptoms, while supplementation with insoluble fiber, such as corn bran or wheat bran, did not improve IBS symptoms (146). In general, fiber supplements improved constipation in IBS patients, but did not improve IBS-associated abdominal pain. Thus, the results of randomized controlled trials suggest that increasing soluble or viscous fiber intake gradually to 12-30 g/day may be beneficial for patients in whom constipation is the predominant symptom of IBS (147). However, fiber supplements could actually exacerbate symptoms in those whom diarrhea predominates (148). A few clinical trials have found that partially hydrolyzed guar gum (5 g/day), a water-soluble, non-gelling fiber, may improve IBS symptoms in patients with diarrhea and in those with constipation-predominant IBS (149). IBS patients should be advised to increase fiber intake gradually, since increasing intake of viscous, readily fermented fibers could increase gas production and bloating.


Food sources

Dietary fiber intakes in the US average from 16-18 g/day for men and 12-14 g/day for women—well below recommended intake levels (4) (see Intake Recommendations). Good sources of dietary fiber include legumes, nuts, whole grains, bran products, fruit, and nonstarchy vegetables. Legumes, whole grains, and nuts are generally more concentrated sources of fiber than fruit and vegetables. All plant-based foods contain mixtures of soluble and insoluble fiber (10). Oat products and legumes are rich sources of soluble and viscous fiber. Wheat bran and whole grains are rich sources of insoluble and nonviscous fiber. The total fiber content of some fiber-rich foods is presented in Table 1. Some strategies for increasing dietary fiber intake include increasing fruit and nonstarchy vegetable intake, increasing intake of legumes, eating whole-grain cereal or oatmeal for breakfast, substituting whole grains for refined grains, and substituting nuts or popcorn for less healthy snacks. For more information about the fiber content of specific foods, search the USDA National Nutrient Database.

Table 1. Some Food Sources of Dietary Fiber
Food Serving Fiber (g)
Navy beans, cooked from dried ½ cup 9.6
Split peas, cooked from dried ½ cup 8.1
Lentils, cooked from dried ½ cup 7.8
Kidney beans, canned ½ cup 6.8
Refried beans, canned ½ cup 6.1
Cereals and grains
100% (wheat) Bran Cereal ½ cup 12.5
Oats ½ cup 8.3
Bulgur, cooked ½ cup 4.1
Pearled barley, cooked ½ cup 3.0
Oat bran, cooked ½ cup 2.9
Quinoa, cooked ½ cup 2.6
Instant oatmeal, cooked ½ cup 2.0
Rice, long-grained brown, cooked ½ cup 1.8
Artichoke hearts, cooked ½ cup 7.2
Spinach, frozen, cooked ½ cup 3.5
Brussel sprouts, frozen, cooked ½ cup 3.2
Winter squash, cooked 1 cup 2.9
Mushrooms, white, cooked from fresh 1 cup 1.7
Prunes, uncooked ½ cup, pitted 6.2
Guava, fresh ½ cup 4.5
Asian pear 1 small pear 4.4
Raspberries, fresh ½ cup 4.0
Blackberries, fresh ½ cup 3.8
Nuts and Seeds
Almonds 1 ounce (23 kernels) 3.5
Pistachio nuts 1 ounce (49 kernels) 2.9
Pecans 1 ounce (19 halves) 2.7
Peanuts 1 ounce 2.4

Isolated fibers and supplements


β-glucans are viscous, easily fermented, soluble fibers found naturally in oats, barley, mushrooms, yeast, bacteria, and algae (151). β-Glucans extracted from oats, mushrooms, and yeast are available in a variety of nutritional supplements without a prescription.


Pectins are viscous fibers, most often extracted from citrus peels and apple pulp. Pectins are widely used as gelling agents in foods but are also available as dietary supplements without a prescription (9).

Inulins and oligofructose

Inulins and oligofructose, extracted from chicory root or synthesized from sucrose, are used as food additives (8). Isolated inulin is added to replace fat in products like salad dressing, while sweet-tasting oligofructose is added to products like fruit yogurts and desserts. Inulins and oligofructose are highly fermentable fibers that are also classified as prebiotics because of their ability to stimulate the growth of potentially beneficial Bifidobacteria species in the human colon (152). Encouraging the growth of Bifidobacteria could promote intestinal health by suppressing the growth of pathogenic bacteria known to cause diarrhea or by enhancing the immune response (153). Although a number of dietary supplements containing inulins and oligofructose are marketed as prebiotics, the health benefits of prebiotics have not yet been convincingly demonstrated in humans (154, 155).

Guar gum

Guar gum is a viscous, fermentable fiber derived from the Indian cluster bean (4). It is used as a thickener or emulsifier in many food products. Dietary supplements containing guar gum have been marketed as weight-loss aids, but a meta-analysis that combined the results of 11 randomized controlled trials found that guar gum supplements were not effective in reducing body weight (156).


Psyllium, a viscous, soluble fiber isolated from psyllium seed husks, is available without a prescription in laxatives, ready-to-eat cereals, and dietary supplements (9). The FDA has approved health claims like the following on the labels of foods containing at least 1.7 g/serving of soluble fiber from psyllium: “Diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol that include 7 g/day of soluble fiber from psyllium may reduce the risk of heart disease (20).”


Chitosan is an indigestible glucosamine polymer derived from chitin. When administered with food, chitosan decreased fat absorption in animal studies (157). Consequently, chitosan has been marketed as a dietary supplement to promote weight loss and lower cholesterol. Controlled clinical trials in humans have not generally found chitosan supplementation to be more effective than placebo in promoting weight loss (158). While some clinical trials in humans have found chitosan supplementation to result in modest reductions in total and LDL cholesterol levels compared to placebo (159, 160), others found no improvement (161, 162). Chitosan is available as a dietary supplement without a prescription in the US

Note: All fiber supplements should be taken with sufficient fluids. Most clinicians recommend taking fiber supplements with at least 8 ounces (240 ml) of water and consuming a total of at least 64 ounces (~2 liters or 2 quarts) of fluid daily (163, 164).


Adverse effects

Dietary fiber

Some people experience abdominal cramping, bloating, or gas when they abruptly increase their dietary fiber intakes (163, 164). These symptoms can be minimized or avoided by increasing intake of fiber-rich foods gradually and increasing fluid intake to at least 64 oz/day (~2 liters or 2 quarts/day). There have been rare reports of intestinal obstruction related to large intakes of oat bran or wheat bran, usually in people with impaired intestinal motility or difficulty chewing (165-168). The Institute of Medicine has not established a tolerable upper intake level (UL) for dietary or functional fiber (4).

Isolated fibers and fiber supplements

Gastrointestinal symptoms: The following fibers have been found to cause gastrointestinal distress, including abdominal cramping, bloating, gas, and diarrhea: guar gum, inulin and oligofructose, fructooligosaccharides, polydextrose, resistant starch, and psyllium (4). Use of a guar gum-containing supplement for weight loss has been associated with esophageal and small bowel obstruction (169). Additionally, several cases of intestinal obstruction by psyllium have been reported when taken with insufficient fluids or by people with impaired swallowing or gastrointestinal motility (170, 171).

Colorectal adenomas: One randomized controlled trial in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas (precancerous polyps) found that supplementation with 3.5 g/day of psyllium for three years resulted in a significant increase in colorectal adenoma recurrence compared to placebo (see Colorectal cancer) (95).

Allergy and anaphylaxis: Since chitin and chitosan may be isolated from the exoskeletons of crustaceans, such as crabs and lobsters, people with shellfish allergies should avoid taking chitin or chitosan supplements (9). Anaphylaxis has been reported after intravenous (IV) administration of inulin (172), as well as ingestion of margarine containing inulin extracted from chicory (173). Anaphylaxis has also been reported after the ingestion of cereals containing psyllium, and asthma has occasionally been reported in people with occupational exposure to psyllium powder (174).

Drug interactions

Psyllium may reduce the absorption of lithium, carbamazepine (Tegretol), digoxin (Lanoxin), and warfarin (Coumadin) when taken at the same time (9). Guar gum may slow the absorption of digoxin, acetaminophen (Tylenol), and bumetanide (Bumex) and decrease the absorption of metformin (Glucophage), penicillin, and some formulations of glyburide (Glynase) when taken at the same time (175). Pectin may decrease the absorption of lovastatin (Mevacor) when taken at the same time (176). Concomitant administration of kaolin-pectin has been reported to decrease the absorption of clindamycin, tetracyclines, and digoxin, but it is not known whether kaolin or pectin is responsible for the interaction (9). In general, medications should be taken at least one hour before or two hours after fiber supplements.

Nutrient interactions

The addition of cereal fiber to meals has generally been found to decrease the absorption of iron, zinc, calcium, and magnesium in the same meal, but this effect appears to be related to the phytate present in the cereal fiber rather than the fiber itself (177). In general, dietary fiber as part of a balanced diet has not been found to adversely affect the calcium, magnesium, iron, or zinc status of healthy people at recommended intake levels (4). Evidence from animal studies and limited research in humans suggests that inulin and oligofructose may enhance calcium absorption (178, 179). The addition of pectin and guar gum to a meal significantly reduced the absorption of the carotenoids β-carotene, lycopene, and lutein from that meal (180, 181).

Intake Recommendations

The Adequate Intake (AI) for total fiber

In light of consistent evidence from prospective cohort studies that fiber-rich diets are associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular disease risk, the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine established its first recommended intake levels for fiber in 2001 (4). The Adequate Intake (AI) recommendations for total fiber intake are based on the findings of several large prospective cohort studies that dietary fiber intakes of approximately 14 g for every 1,000 calories (kcal) consumed were associated with significant reductions in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) (42, 43, 45), as well as type 2 diabetes (66, 67). For adults who are 50 years of age and younger, the AI recommendation for total fiber intake is 38 g/day for men and 25 g/day for women. For adults over 50 years of age, the recommendation is 30 g/day for men and 21 g/day for women. The AI recommendations for males and females of all ages are presented in Table 2 (4).

Table 2. Adequate Intake (AI) for Total Fiber
Life Stage Age Males (g/day) Females (g/day)
Infants  0-6 months   ND* ND
Infants  7-12 months   ND ND
Children  1-3 years   19 19
Children  4-8 years   25 25
Children  9-13 years   31 26
Adolescents  14-18 years   38 26
Adults  19-50 years   38 25
Adults 51 years and older   30 21
Pregnancy  all ages   - 28
Breast-feeding  all ages   - 29
* Not determined

Some suggestions for increasing fiber intake

  • Eat at least five servings of fruit and vegetables daily (see Fruit and Vegetables).
  • Substitute whole grains for refined grains (see Whole Grains).
  • Eat oatmeal, whole-grain cereal, or bran cereal for breakfast.
  • Eat beans, split peas, or lentils at least once weekly (see Legumes).
  • Substitute nuts or popcorn for less healthful snacks like potato chips or candy (see Nuts).

Authors and Reviewers

Originally written in 2004 by:
Jane Higdon, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in December 2005 by:
Jane Higdon, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in August 2009 by:
Victoria J. Drake, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in April 2012 by:
Victoria J. Drake, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Reviewed in April 2012 by:
David M. Klurfeld, Ph.D.
National Program Leader, Human Nutrition
USDA Agricultural Research Service

Copyright 2004-2015  Linus Pauling Institute


1.  Lupton JR. Microbial degradation products influence colon cancer risk: the butyrate controversy. J Nutr. 2004;134(2):479-482.  (PubMed)

2.  Ha MA, Jarvis MC, Mann JI. A definition for dietary fibre. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(12):861-864.  (PubMed)

3.  DeVries JW. On defining dietary fibre. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62(1):37-43.  (PubMed)

4.  Institute of Medicine. Dietary, Functional, and Total Fiber. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press; 2002:265-334.  (The National Academies Press)

5.  Trowell H. Dietary fibre, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Proc Nutr Soc. 1973;32(3):151-157.  (PubMed)

6.  Lupton JR, Turner ND. Dietary Fiber. In: Stipanuk MH, ed. Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Human Nutrition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2000:143-154.

7.  Gallaher CM, Schneeman BO. Dietary Fiber. In: Bowman BA, Russell RM, eds. Present Knowledge in Nutrition. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: ILSI Press; 2001:83-91.

8.  Niness KR. Inulin and oligofructose: what are they? J Nutr. 1999;129(7 Suppl):1402S-1406S.  (PubMed)

9.  Hendler SS, Rorvik DR (eds). PDR for Nutritional Supplements. 2nd ed. Montvale: Physicians' Desk Reference Inc.; 2008.

10.  Marlett JA. Content and composition of dietary fiber in 117 frequently consumed foods. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992;92(2):175-186.  (PubMed)

11.  Bazzano LA, Thompson AM, Tees MT, Nguyen CH, Winham DM. Non-soy legume consumption lowers cholesterol levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;21(2):94-103.  (PubMed)

12.  Zhang Z, Lanza E, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. A high legume low glycemic index diet improves serum lipid profiles in men. Lipids. 2010;45(9):765-775.  (PubMed)

13  Anderson JW, Major AW. Pulses and lipaemia, short- and long-term effect: potential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Br J Nutr. 2002;88(Suppl 3):S263-271.  (PubMed)

14.  Wolever TM, Tosh SM, Gibbs AL, et al. Physicochemical properties of oat beta-glucan influence its ability to reduce serum LDL cholesterol in humans: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(4):723-732.  (PubMed)

15.  Naumann E, van Rees AB, Onning G, Oste R, Wydra M, Mensink RP. Beta-glucan incorporated into a fruit drink effectively lowers serum LDL-cholesterol concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(3):601-605.  (PubMed)

16.  Ripsin CM, Keenan JM, Jacobs DR, Jr., et al. Oat products and lipid lowering. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1992;267(24):3317-3325.  (PubMed)

17.  Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(1):30-42.  (PubMed)

18.  Queenan KM, Stewart ML, Smith KN, Thomas W, Fulcher RG, Slavin JL. Concentrated oat beta-glucan, a fermentable fiber, lowers serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic adults in a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2007;6:6.  (PubMed)

19.  Reyna-Villasmil N, Bermudez-Pirela V, Mengual-Moreno E, et al. Oat-derived beta-glucan significantly improves HDLC and diminishes LDLC and non-HDL cholesterol in overweight individuals with mild hypercholesterolemia. Am J Ther. 2007;14(2):203-212.  (PubMed)

20.  Food and Drug Administration. Food labeling: health claims; soluble dietary fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2003;68(144):44207-44209.

21.  Wei ZH, Wang H, Chen XY, et al. Time- and dose-dependent effect of psyllium on serum lipids in mild-to-moderate hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(7):821-827.  (PubMed)

22.  Pal S, Khossousi A, Binns C, Dhaliwal S, Ellis V. The effect of a fibre supplement compared to a healthy diet on body composition, lipids, glucose, insulin and other metabolic syndrome risk factors in overweight and obese individuals. Br J Nutr. 2011;105(1):90-100.  (PubMed)

23.  Anderson JW, Allgood LD, Lawrence A, et al. Cholesterol-lowering effects of psyllium intake adjunctive to diet therapy in men and women with hypercholesterolemia: meta-analysis of 8 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(2):472-479.  (PubMed)

24.  Butt MS, Shahzadi N, Sharif MK, Nasir M. Guar gum: a miracle therapy for hypercholesterolemia, hyperglycemia and obesity. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47(4):389-396.  (PubMed)

25.  Theuwissen E, Mensink RP. Water-soluble dietary fibers and cardiovascular disease. Physiol Behav. 2008;94(2):285-292.  (PubMed)

26.  Bazzano LA. Effects of soluble dietary fiber on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2008;10(6):473-477.  (PubMed)

27.  Schafer G, Schenk U, Ritzel U, Ramadori G, Leonhardt U. Comparison of the effects of dried peas with those of potatoes in mixed meals on postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(1):99-103.  (PubMed)

28.  Kabir M, Oppert JM, Vidal H, et al. Four-week low-glycemic index breakfast with a modest amount of soluble fibers in type 2 diabetic men. Metabolism. 2002;51(7):819-826.  (PubMed)

29.  Brand-Miller JC, Atkinson FS, Gahler RJ, Kacinik V, Lyon MR, Wood S. Effects of PGX, a novel functional fibre, on acute and delayed postprandial glycaemia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(12):1488-1493.  (PubMed)

30.  Jenkins AL, Kacinik V, Lyon MR, Wolever TM. Reduction of postprandial glycemia by the novel viscous polysaccharide PGX, in a dose-dependent manner, independent of food form. J Am Coll Nutr. 2010;29(2):92-98.  (PubMed)

31  Williams JA, Lai CS, Corwin H, et al. Inclusion of guar gum and alginate into a crispy bar improves postprandial glycemia in humans. J Nutr. 2004;134(4):886-889.  (PubMed)

32.  Sierra M, Garcia JJ, Fernandez N, Diez MJ, Calle AP, Sahagun AM. Effects of ispaghula husk and guar gum on postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55(4):235-243.  (PubMed)

33.  Wolever TM, Jenkins DA. Effect of Dietary Fiber and Foods on Carbohydrate Metabolism. In: Spiller GA, ed. CRC Handbook of Dietary Fiber in Human Nutrition. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001:321-360.

34.  Marlett JA, McBurney MI, Slavin JL. Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(7):993-1000.  (PubMed)

35.  Cummings JH. The effect of dietary fiber on fecal weight and composition. In: Spiller GA, ed. Fiber in Human Nutrition. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001:183-252.

36.  Anti M, Pignataro G, Armuzzi A, et al. Water supplementation enhances the effect of high-fiber diet on stool frequency and laxative consumption in adult patients with functional constipation. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45(21):727-732.  (PubMed)

37.  American Academy of Family Physicians. Constipation: Keeping Your Bowels Moving Smoothly [Web page]. April 2000. Accessed 9/14/04.

38.  Fraser GE, Sabate J, Beeson WL, Strahan TM. A possible protective effect of nut consumption on risk of coronary heart disease. The Adventist Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(7):1416-1424.  (PubMed)

39.  Humble CG, Malarcher AM, Tyroler HA. Dietary fiber and coronary heart disease in middle-aged hypercholesterolemic men. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9(4):197-202.  (PubMed)

40.  Jacobs DR, Jr., Meyer KA, Kushi LH, Folsom AR. Whole-grain intake may reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease death in postmenopausal women: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(2):248-257.  (PubMed)

41.  Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E. Dietary fiber and reduced ischemic heart disease mortality rates in men and women: a 12-year prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126(6):1093-1102.  (PubMed)

42.  Pietinen P, Rimm EB, Korhonen P, et al. Intake of dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease in a cohort of Finnish men. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. Circulation. 1996;94(11):2720-2727.  (PubMed)

43.  Rimm EB, Ascherio A, Giovannucci E, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Vegetable, fruit, and cereal fiber intake and risk of coronary heart disease among men. JAMA. 1996;275(6):447-451.  (PubMed)

44.  Todd S, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Bolton-Smith C. Dietary antioxidant vitamins and fiber in the etiology of cardiovascular disease and all-causes mortality: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(10):1073-1080.  (PubMed)

45.  Wolk A, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Long-term intake of dietary fiber and decreased risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA. 1999;281(21):1998-2004.  (PubMed)

46.  Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, Loria CM, Whelton PK. Dietary fiber intake and reduced risk of coronary heart disease in US men and women: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(16):1897-1904.  (PubMed)

47.  Mozaffarian D, Kumanyika SK, Lemaitre RN, Olson JL, Burke GL, Siscovick DS. Cereal, fruit, and vegetable fiber intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease in elderly individuals. JAMA. 2003;289(13):1659-1666.  (PubMed)

48.  Streppel MT, Ocke MC, Boshuizen HC, Kok FJ, Kromhout D. Dietary fiber intake in relation to coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality over 40 y: the Zutphen Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(4):1119-1125.  (PubMed)

49.  Eshak ES, Iso H, Date C, et al. Dietary fiber intake is associated with reduced risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese men and women. J Nutr. 2010;140(8):1445-1453.  (PubMed)

50.  Park Y, Subar AF, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A. Dietary fiber intake and mortality in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(12):1061-1068.  (PubMed)

51.  Pereira MA, O'Reilly E, Augustsson K, et al. Dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(4):370-376.  (PubMed)

52.  Liu S, Willett WC. Dietary glycemic load and atherothrombotic risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2002;4(6):454-461.  (PubMed)

53.  Ford ES, Liu S. Glycemic index and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration among US adults. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(4):572-576.  (PubMed)

54.  Liu S, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(3):560-566.  (PubMed)

55.  Ascherio A, Hennekens C, Willett WC, et al. Prospective study of nutritional factors, blood pressure, and hypertension among US women. Hypertension. 1996;27(5):1065-1072.  (PubMed)

56.  Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, et al. A prospective study of nutritional factors and hypertension among US men. Circulation. 1992;86(5):1475-1484.  (PubMed)

57.  Streppel MT, Arends LR, van 't Veer P, Grobbee DE, Geleijnse JM. Dietary fiber and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):150-156.  (PubMed)

58.  Whelton SP, Hyre AD, Pedersen B, Yi Y, Whelton PK, He J. Effect of dietary fiber intake on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials. J Hypertens. 2005;23(3):475-481.  (PubMed)

59.  King DE, Egan BM, Woolson RF, Mainous AG, 3rd, Al-Solaiman Y, Jesri A. Effect of a high-fiber diet vs a fiber-supplemented diet on C-reactive protein level. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):502-506.  (PubMed)

60.  Ma Y, Griffith JA, Chasan-Taber L, et al. Association between dietary fiber and serum C-reactive protein. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(4):760-766.  (PubMed)

61.  Patel VB, Robbins MA, Topol EJ. C-reactive protein: a 'golden marker' for inflammation and coronary artery disease. Cleve Clin J Med. 2001;68(6):521-524, 527-534.  (PubMed)

62.  Lupton JR, Turner ND. Dietary fiber and coronary disease: does the evidence support an association? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2003;5(6):500-505.  (PubMed)

63.  Gross LS, Li L, Ford ES, Liu S. Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates and the epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the United States: an ecologic assessment. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):774-779.  (PubMed)

64.  Wannamethee SG, Whincup PH, Thomas MC, Sattar N. Associations between dietary fiber and inflammation, hepatic function, and risk of type 2 diabetes in older men: potential mechanisms for the benefits of fiber on diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(10):1823-1825.  (PubMed)

65.  Hopping BN, Erber E, Grandinetti A, Verheus M, Kolonel LN, Maskarinec G. Dietary fiber, magnesium, and glycemic load alter risk of type 2 diabetes in a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii. J Nutr. 2010;140(1):68-74.  (PubMed)

66.  Salmeron J, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, et al. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4):545-550.  (PubMed)

67.  Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA. 1997;277(6):472-477.  (PubMed)

68.  Meyer KA, Kushi LH, Jacobs DR, Jr., Slavin J, Sellers TA, Folsom AR. Carbohydrates, dietary fiber, and incident type 2 diabetes in older women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(4):921-930.  (PubMed)

69.  Stevens J, Ahn K, Juhaeri, Houston D, Steffan L, Couper D. Dietary fiber intake and glycemic index and incidence of diabetes in African-American and white adults: the ARIC study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(10):1715-1721.   (PubMed)

70.  Montonen J, Knekt P, Jarvinen R, Aromaa A, Reunanen A. Whole-grain and fiber intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(3):622-629.  (PubMed)

71.  Schulze MB, Liu S, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(2):348-356.   (PubMed)

72.  Ventura E, Davis J, Byrd-Williams C, et al. Reduction in risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus in response to a low-sugar, high-fiber dietary intervention in overweight Latino adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(4):320-327.  (PubMed)

73.  Krishnan S, Rosenberg L, Singer M, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and cereal fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in US black women. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(21):2304-2309.  (PubMed)

74.  Schulze MB, Schulz M, Heidemann C, Schienkiewitz A, Hoffmann K, Boeing H. Fiber and magnesium intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(9):956-965.  (PubMed)

75.  Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.  (PubMed)

76.  Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1343-1350.  (PubMed)

77.  Trock B, Lanza E, Greenwald P. Dietary fiber, vegetables, and colon cancer: critical review and meta-analyses of the epidemiologic evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82(8):650-661.  (PubMed)

78.  Howe GR, Benito E, Castelleto R, et al. Dietary intake of fiber and decreased risk of cancers of the colon and rectum: evidence from the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84(24):1887-1896.  (PubMed)

79.  Dahm CC, Keogh RH, Spencer EA, et al. Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: a nested case-control study using food diaries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):614-626.  (PubMed)

80.  Steinmetz KA, Kushi LH, Bostick RM, Folsom AR, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and colon cancer in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(1):1-15.  (PubMed)

81.  Kato I, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig K, Toniolo PG, Shore RE, Riboli E. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study. Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(3):276-281.  (PubMed)

82.  Pietinen P, Malila N, Virtanen M, et al. Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men. Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10(5):387-396.  (PubMed)

83.  Terry P, Giovannucci E, Michels KB, et al. Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(7):525-533.  (PubMed)

84.  Mai V, Flood A, Peters U, Lacey JV, Jr., Schairer C, Schatzkin A. Dietary fibre and risk of colorectal cancer in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP) follow-up cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(2):234-239.  (PubMed)

85.  Lin J, Zhang SM, Cook NR, et al. Dietary intakes of fruit, vegetables, and fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort of women (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(3):225-233.  (PubMed)

86.  Michels KB, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, et al. Fiber intake and incidence of colorectal cancer among 76,947 women and 47,279 men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(4):842-849.  (PubMed)

87.  Shin A, Li H, Shu XO, Yang G, Gao YT, Zheng W. Dietary intake of calcium, fiber and other micronutrients in relation to colorectal cancer risk: Results from the Shanghai Women's Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(12):2938-2942.  (PubMed)

88.  Otani T, Iwasaki M, Ishihara J, Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Tsugane S. Dietary fiber intake and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(6):1475-1480.   (PubMed)

89.  Schatzkin A, Mouw T, Park Y, et al. Dietary fiber and whole-grain consumption in relation to colorectal cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(5):1353-1360.  (PubMed)

90.  Park Y, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, et al. Dietary fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies. JAMA. 2005;294(22):2849-2857.  (PubMed)

91.  Bingham SA, Day NE, Luben R, et al. Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1496-1501.  (PubMed)

92.  Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D, et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1149-1155.  (PubMed)

93.  Alberts DS, Martinez ME, Roe DJ, et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1156-1162.   (PubMed)

94.  Ishikawa H, Akedo I, Otani T, et al. Randomized trial of dietary fiber and Lactobacillus casei administration for prevention of colorectal tumors. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(5):762-767.  (PubMed)

95.  Bonithon-Kopp C, Kronborg O, Giacosa A, Rath U, Faivre J. Calcium and fibre supplementation in prevention of colorectal adenoma recurrence: a randomised intervention trial. European Cancer Prevention Organisation Study Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9238):1300-1306.  (PubMed)

96.  Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Relationship of diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84(2):91-98.  (PubMed)

97.  Van 't Veer P, Kolb CM, Verhoef P, et al. Dietary fiber, beta-carotene and breast cancer: results from a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1990;45(5):825-828.

98.  Baghurst PA, Rohan TE. High-fiber diets and reduced risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1994;56(2):173-176.  (PubMed)

99.  Yuan JM, Wang QS, Ross RK, Henderson BE, Yu MC. Diet and breast cancer in Shanghai and Tianjin, China. Br J Cancer. 1995;71(6):1353-1358.  (PubMed)

100.  Ronco A, De Stefani E, Boffetta P, Deneo-Pellegrini H, Mendilaharsu M, Leborgne F. Vegetables, fruit, and related nutrients and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay. Nutr Cancer. 1999;35(2):111-119.   (PubMed)

101.  Belle FN, Kampman E, McTiernan A, et al. Dietary fiber, carbohydrates, glycemic index, and glycemic load in relation to breast cancer prognosis in the HEAL cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(5):890-899.  (PubMed)

102.  Graham S, Zielezny M, Marshall J, et al. Diet in the epidemiology of postmenopausal breast cancer in the New York State Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136(11):1327-1337.  (PubMed)

103.  Terry P, Jain M, Miller AB, Howe GR, Rohan TE. No association among total dietary fiber, fiber fractions, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(11):1507-1508.  (PubMed)

104.  Cho E, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Chen WY, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Premenopausal dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, glycemic load, and fiber in relation to risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(11 Pt 1):1153-1158.  (PubMed)

105.  Holmes MD, Liu S, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Willett WC. Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(8):732-739.  (PubMed)

106.  Lajous M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Fabre A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Romieu I. Carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a prospective study of French women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(5):1384-1391.  (PubMed)

107.  Wen W, Shu XO, Li H, et al. Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk in Chinese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(1):283-289.  (PubMed)

108.  Maruti SS, Lampe JW, Potter JD, Ready A, White E. A prospective study of bowel motility and related factors on breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(7):1746-1750.  (PubMed)

109.  Cade JE, Burley VJ, Greenwood DC. Dietary fibre and risk of breast cancer in the UK Women's Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(2):431-438.  (PubMed)

110.  Mattisson I, Wirfalt E, Johansson U, Gullberg B, Olsson H, Berglund G. Intakes of plant foods, fibre and fat and risk of breast cancer--a prospective study in the Malmo Diet and Cancer cohort. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(1):122-127.  (PubMed)

111.  Park Y, Brinton LA, Subar AF, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(3):664-671.  (PubMed)

112.  Dong JY, He K, Wang P, Qin LQ. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(3):900-905.  (PubMed)

113.  Rock CL, Flatt SW, Thomson CA, et al. Effects of a high-fiber, low-fat diet intervention on serum concentrations of reproductive steroid hormones in women with a history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(12):2379-2387.  (PubMed)

114.  Kasim-Karakas SE, Almario RU, Gregory L, Todd H, Wong R, Lasley BL. Effects of prune consumption on the ratio of 2-hydroxyestrone to 16alpha-hydroxyestrone. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(6):1422-1427.  (PubMed)

115.  Korzenik JR. Case closed? Diverticulitis: epidemiology and fiber. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(Suppl 3):S112-116.  (PubMed)

116.  Bogardus ST, Jr. What do we know about diverticular disease? A brief overview. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(Suppl 3):S108-111. (PubMed)

117.  Peery AF, Barrett PR, Park D, et al. A high-fiber diet does not protect against asymptomatic diverticulosis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):266-272e1.  (PubMed)

118.  Farrell RJ, Farrell JJ, Morrin MM. Diverticular disease in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2001;30(2):475-496.  (PubMed)

119.  Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rockett HR, Sampson L, Rimm EB, Willett WC. A prospective study of dietary fiber types and symptomatic diverticular disease in men. J Nutr. 1998;128(4):714-719.  (PubMed)

120.  Howarth NC, Saltzman E, Roberts SB. Dietary fiber and weight regulation. Nutr Rev. 2001;59(5):129-139.  (PubMed)

121.  Du H, van der AD, Boshuizen HC, et al. Dietary fiber and subsequent changes in body weight and waist circumference in European men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(2):329-336.  (PubMed)

122.  Appleby PN, Thorogood M, Mann JI, Key TJ. Low body mass index in non-meat eaters: the possible roles of animal fat, dietary fibre and alcohol. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22(5):454-460.  (PubMed)

123.  Miller WC, Niederpruem MG, Wallace JP, Lindeman AK. Dietary fat, sugar, and fiber predict body fat content. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94(6):612-615.  (PubMed)

124.  Davis JN, Hodges VA, Gillham MB. Normal-weight adults consume more fiber and fruit than their age- and height-matched overweight/obese counterparts. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(6):833-840.  (PubMed)

125.  Liu S, Willett WC, Manson JE, Hu FB, Rosner B, Colditz G. Relation between changes in intakes of dietary fiber and grain products and changes in weight and development of obesity among middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(5):920-927.  (PubMed)

126.  Saltzman E, Moriguti JC, Das SK, et al. Effects of a cereal rich in soluble fiber on body composition and dietary compliance during consumption of a hypocaloric diet. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20(1):50-57.  (PubMed)

127.  Howarth NC, Saltzman E, McCrory MA, et al. Fermentable and nonfermentable fiber supplements did not alter hunger, satiety or body weight in a pilot study of men and women consuming self-selected diets. J Nutr. 2003;133(10):3141-3144.  (PubMed)

128.  Wanders AJ, van den Borne JJ, de Graaf C, et al. Effects of dietary fibre on subjective appetite, energy intake and body weight: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2011;12(9):724-739.  (PubMed)

129  Lubin F, Lusky A, Chetrit A, Dankner R. Lifestyle and ethnicity play a role in all-cause mortality. J Nutr. 2003;133(4):1180-1185.  (PubMed)

130.  Baer HJ, Glynn RJ, Hu FB, et al. Risk factors for mortality in the nurses' health study: a competing risks analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(3):319-329.  (PubMed)

131.  Giacco R, Parillo M, Rivellese AA, et al. Long-term dietary treatment with increased amounts of fiber-rich low-glycemic index natural foods improves blood glucose control and reduces the number of hypoglycemic events in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(10):1461-1466.  (PubMed)

132.  Chandalia M, Garg A, Lutjohann D, von Bergmann K, Grundy SM, Brinkley LJ. Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(19):1392-1398.  (PubMed)

133.  Groop PH, Aro A, Stenman S, Groop L. Long-term effects of guar gum in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;58(4):513-518.  (PubMed)

134.  Sierra M, Garcia JJ, Fernandez N, Diez MJ, Calle AP. Therapeutic effects of psyllium in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(9):830-842.  (PubMed)

135.  Anderson JW, Allgood LD, Turner J, Oeltgen PR, Daggy BP. Effects of psyllium on glucose and serum lipid responses in men with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(4):466-473.  (PubMed)

136.  Anderson JW, Randles KM, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ. Carbohydrate and fiber recommendations for individuals with diabetes: a quantitative assessment and meta-analysis of the evidence. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(1):5-17.   (PubMed)

137.  American Diabetes Association position statement: evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(1):109-118.   (PubMed)

138.  Dietary recommendations for people with diabetes: an update for the 1990s. Nutrition Subcommittee of the British Diabetic Association's Professional Advisory Committee. Diabet Med. 1992;9(2):189-202.  (PubMed)

139.  Canadian Diabetes Association, National Nutrition Committee. Guidelines for the Nutritional Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the New Millennium: A Position Statement of the Canadian Diabetes Association. Can J Diabetes Care. 1999;23(3):56-69.

140.  Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Augustin LS, et al. Effect of wheat bran on glycemic control and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(9):1522-1528.  (PubMed)

141.  Horwitz BJ, Fisher RS. The irritable bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(24):1846-1850.  (PubMed)

142.  Jailwala J, Imperiale TF, Kroenke K. Pharmacologic treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(2):136-147.  (PubMed)

143.  Ford AC, Talley NJ, Spiegel BM, et al. Effect of fibre, antispasmodics, and peppermint oil in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a2313.  (PubMed)

144.  Quartero AO, Meineche-Schmidt V, Muris J, Rubin G, de Wit N. Bulking agents, antispasmodic and antidepressant medication for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD003460.   (PubMed)

145.  Bijkerk CJ, de Wit NJ, Muris JW, Whorwell PJ, Knottnerus JA, Hoes AW. Soluble or insoluble fibre in irritable bowel syndrome in primary care? Randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b3154.  (PubMed)

146.  Bijkerk CJ, Muris JW, Knottnerus JA, Hoes AW, de Wit NJ. Systematic review: the role of different types of fibre in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19(3):245-251.  (PubMed)

147.  Viera AJ, Hoag S, Shaughnessy J. Management of irritable bowel syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(10):1867-1874.  (PubMed)

148.  Mertz HR. Irritable bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2136-2146.  (PubMed)

149.  Giannini EG, Mansi C, Dulbecco P, Savarino V. Role of partially hydrolyzed guar gum in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrition. 2006;22(3):334-342.  (PubMed)

150.  US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Release 24. 2011. Available at: Accessed 4/6/12.

151.  Hendler SS, Rorvik DR (eds). PDR for Nutritional Supplements. Montvale: Medical Economics Company, Inc; 2001.

152.  Gibson GR, Beatty ER, Wang X, Cummings JH. Selective stimulation of bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(4):975-982.  (PubMed)

153.  Kolida S, Tuohy K, Gibson GR. Prebiotic effects of inulin and oligofructose. Br J Nutr. 2002;87(Suppl 2):S193-197.  (PubMed)

154.  Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. Gastrointestinal effects of prebiotics. Br J Nutr. 2002;87(Suppl 2):S145-151.  (PubMed)

155.  Duggan C, Penny ME, Hibberd P, et al. Oligofructose-supplemented infant cereal: 2 randomized, blinded, community-based trials in Peruvian infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(4):937-942.  (PubMed)

156.  Pittler MH, Ernst E. Guar gum for body weight reduction: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Med. 2001;110(9):724-730.  (PubMed)

157.  Gallaher CM, Munion J, Hesslink R, Jr., Wise J, Gallaher DD. Cholesterol reduction by glucomannan and chitosan is mediated by changes in cholesterol absorption and bile acid and fat excretion in rats. J Nutr. 2000;130(11):2753-2759.  (PubMed)

158.  Pittler MH, Ernst E. Dietary supplements for body-weight reduction: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(4):529-536.  (PubMed)

159.  Bokura H, Kobayashi S. Chitosan decreases total cholesterol in women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(5):721-725.  (PubMed)

160.  Wuolijoki E, Hirvela T, Ylitalo P. Decrease in serum LDL cholesterol with microcrystalline chitosan. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1999;21(5):357-361.  (PubMed)

161.  Metso S, Ylitalo R, Nikkila M, Wuolijoki E, Ylitalo P, Lehtimaki T. The effect of long-term microcrystalline chitosan therapy on plasma lipids and glucose concentrations in subjects with increased plasma total cholesterol: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial in healthy men and women. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59(10):741-746.  (PubMed)

162.  Ho SC, Tai ES, Eng PH, Tan CE, Fok AC. In the absence of dietary surveillance, chitosan does not reduce plasma lipids or obesity in hypercholesterolaemic obese Asian subjects. Singapore Med J. 2001;42(1):006-010.   (PubMed)

163.  American Academy of Family Physicians. Fiber: How to Increase the Amount in Your Diet [Web page]. March, 2004. Available at: Accessed 4/13/12.

164.  Papazian R. Bulking Up Fiber's Healthful Reputation: More Benefits of 'Roughage Are Discovered'. Food and Drug Administration, [Web page]. September, 1998. Accessed 8/27/09.

165.  Rosario PG, Gerst PH, Prakash K, Albu E. Dentureless distention: oat bran bezoars cause obstruction. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38(5):608.  (PubMed)

166.  Miller DL, Miller PF, Dekker JJ. Small-bowel obstruction from bran cereal. JAMA. 1990;263(6):813-814.  (PubMed)

167.  Cooper SG, Tracey EJ. Small-bowel obstruction caused by oat-bran bezoar. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(17):1148-1149.  (PubMed)

168.  McClurken JB, Carp NZ. Bran-induced small-intestinal obstruction in a patient with no history of abdominal operation. Arch Surg. 1988;123(1):98-100.  (PubMed)

169.  Lewis JH. Esophageal and small bowel obstruction from guar gum-containing "diet pills": analysis of 26 cases reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87(10):1424-1428.  (PubMed)

170.  Agha FP, Nostrant TT, Fiddian-Green RG. "Giant colonic bezoar:" a medication bezoar due to psyllium seed husks. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984;79(4):319-321.  (PubMed)

171.  Schneider RP. Perdiem causes esophageal impaction and bezoars. South Med J. 1989;82(11):1449-1450.  (PubMed)

172.  Chandra R, Barron JL. Anaphylactic reaction to intravenous sinistrin (Inutest). Ann Clin Biochem. 2002;39(Pt 1):76.  (PubMed)

173.  Gay-Crosier F, Schreiber G, Hauser C. Anaphylaxis from inulin in vegetables and processed food. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1372.  (PubMed)

174.  Khalili B, Bardana EJ, Jr., Yunginger JW. Psyllium-associated anaphylaxis and death: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;91(6):579-584.  (PubMed)

175.  Fugh-Berman A. Herb-drug interactions. Lancet. 2000;355(9198):134-138.  (PubMed)

176.  Richter WO, Jacob BG, Schwandt P. Interaction between fibre and lovastatin. Lancet. 1991;338(8768):706.  (PubMed)

177.  Greger JL. Nondigestible carbohydrates and mineral bioavailability. J Nutr. 1999;129(7 Suppl):1434S-1435S.  (PubMed)

178.  Bosscher D, Van Caillie-Bertrand M, Van Cauwenbergh R, Deelstra H. Availabilities of calcium, iron, and zinc from dairy infant formulas is affected by soluble dietary fibers and modified starch fractions. Nutrition. 2003;19(7-8):641-645.  (PubMed)

179.  Scholz-Ahrens KE, Schrezenmeir J. Inulin, oligofructose and mineral metabolism - experimental data and mechanism. Br J Nutr. 2002;87(Suppl 2):S179-186.  (PubMed)

180.  Rock CL, Swendseid ME. Plasma beta-carotene response in humans after meals supplemented with dietary pectin. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(1):96-99.  (PubMed)

181.  Riedl J, Linseisen J, Hoffmann J, Wolfram G. Some dietary fibers reduce the absorption of carotenoids in women. J Nutr. 1999;129(12):2170-2176.  (PubMed)