• Vitamin D can be synthesized in the skin upon exposure to sunlight and is then metabolized in the liver and kidney to the metabolically active form called 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Through binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D can regulate the expression of hundreds of genes involved in skeletal and other biological functions. (More information)
  • Vitamin D is essential for maintenance of bone mineralization through the regulation of calcium and phosphorus homeostasis. Vitamin D also exhibits many non-skeletal effects, particularly on the immune, endocrine, and cardiovascular systems. (More information)
  • Vitamin D is important for normal bone development and maintenance. Severe vitamin D deficiency causes rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. (More information)
  • Secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D insufficiency can increase bone breakdown and precipitate osteoporosis. Randomized clinical trials indicate that high doses of supplemental vitamin D can reduce the risk of falls and fractures in older individuals. (More information)
  • Vitamin D can regulate cell differentiation and growth by binding to the vitamin D receptor found in most body cells. Observational studies have reported associations between low sun exposure, poor vitamin D status, and increased risk of developing colorectal and breast cancer. Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether cancer prevention may benefit from vitamin D supplementation. (More information)
  • Various observational studies have reported an association between vitamin D status and the susceptibility or severity of autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. (More information)
  • Current evidence from observational studies suggests an inverse relationship between circulating vitamin D concentrations and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is not yet known whether correcting vitamin D deficiency in individuals with glucose intolerance can decrease the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes. (More information)
  • Randomized clinical trials are currently investigating whether vitamin D supplementation can limit cognitive deterioration and disease progression in subjects with neurodegenerative disease. (More information)
  • Vitamin D insufficiency in pregnant women may be associated with several adverse effects for the mother and newborn. Safety and benefits of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy both need to be evaluated in clinical trials. (More information)
  • Recent preliminary studies have shown that vitamin D supplementation may offer promising improvements in the management of atopic dermatitis (eczema) and Crohn's disease. (More information)

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that regulates calcium homeostasis and is vital for bone health (1). While it can also be obtained from dietary sources or supplements, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is synthesized in the human skin from 7-dehydrocholesterol upon exposure to ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation from sunlight (see the article on Vitamin D and Skin Health). Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) is a vitamin D analog photosynthesized in plants, mushrooms, and yeasts; vitamin D2 is also sometimes used in vitamin D food fortification (2). When vitamin D3 in skin is inadequate due to insufficient exposure to UVB radiation, oral intake of vitamin D is necessary to meet vitamin D requirements.


Vitamin D metabolism

Cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol are biologically inactive precursors of vitamin D and must be converted to biologically active forms in the liver and kidneys. Indeed, following dietary intake or synthesis in the epidermis of skin after UVB exposure, both forms of vitamin D enter the circulation and are transported to the liver by the vitamin D-binding protein (and to a lesser extent by albumin). In hepatocytes (liver cells), vitamin D is hydroxylated to form 25-hydroxyvitamin D (calcidiol; calcifediol). Exposure to sunlight or dietary intake of vitamin D increases serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. 25-hydroxyvitamin D constitutes the major circulating form of vitamin D, and the sum of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels in serum is used as an indicator of vitamin D nutritional status (3). The renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase enzyme (also known as CYP27B1) eventually catalyzes a second hydroxylation that converts 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol). The production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in the kidneys is regulated by several factors, including serum phosphorus, calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D itself. While the kidney is the main source of 1α-hydroxylase activity, extra-renal production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D has also been demonstrated in a variety of tissues, including skin, parathyroid gland, breast, colon, prostate, as well as cells of the immune system and bone cells (2). Most of the physiological effects of vitamin D in the body are related to the activity of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (4). Various forms of vitamin D are listed in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Forms of Vitamin D. vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) present in plants; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) present in the skin of animals; vitamin D3 is converted 25-hydroxyvitamin D (calcidiol) in the liver and then converted to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) in the kidneys.

Mechanisms of action

Most, if not all, actions of vitamin D are mediated through a nuclear transcription factor known as the vitamin D receptor (VDR) (5). Upon entering the nucleus of a cell, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D binds to the VDR and recruits another nuclear receptor known as retinoic acid X receptor (RXR). In the presence of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, the VDR/RXR complex binds small sequences of DNA known as vitamin D response elements (VDREs) and initiates a cascade of molecular interactions that modulate the transcription of specific genes. Thousands of VDREs have been identified throughout the genome, and VDR activation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is thought to directly and/or indirectly regulate 100 to 1,250 genes (6).

Calcium balance

Maintenance of serum calcium levels within a narrow range is vital for normal functioning of the nervous system, as well as for bone growth and maintenance of bone density. Vitamin D is essential for the efficient utilization of calcium by the body (1). The parathyroid glands sense serum calcium levels and secrete parathyroid hormone (PTH) if calcium levels decrease below normal (Figure 2). Elevations in PTH stimulate the activity of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase enzyme in the kidney, resulting in increased production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Higher levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D result in VDR activation and changes in gene expression that normalize serum calcium by (1) increasing the intestinal absorption of dietary calcium, (2) increasing the reabsorption of calcium filtered by the kidneys, and (3) mobilizing calcium from bone when there is insufficient dietary calcium to maintain normal serum calcium levels (7).

Figure 2. The Vitamin D Endocrine System. The parathyroid glands sense the serum calcium level, and secrete parathyroid hormone (PTH) if it becomes too low. When dietary calcium intake is inadequate, PTH stimulates the activity of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-hydroxylase enzyme in the kidney, resulting in increased production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25 (OH)2D; calcitriol), the biologically active form of vitamin D. Increased 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production restores normal serum calcium levels in three different ways: (1) by activating the vitamin D-dependent transport system in the small intestine, which increases the absorption of dietary calcium; (2) by increasing the mobilization of calcium from bone into the circulation; and (3) by increasing the reabsorption of calcium by the kidneys. PTH is also required to increase calcium mobilization from bone and calcium reabsorption by the kidneys. However, PTH is not required for the effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D on the intestinal absorption of calcium.

Phosphorus balance

The regulations of calcium and phosphorus homeostasis are closely related, and the calciotropic hormones PTH and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D can also control serum phosphorus. Specifically, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increases intestinal phosphorus absorption by stimulating the expression of a sodium-phosphate cotransporter in the small intestine. While PTH increases urinary excretion of phosphorus by reducing reabsorption in the kidney, it is not yet clear whether 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D can directly regulate renal phosphorus transport. The phosphaturic hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), secreted by osteoblasts (bone-forming cells), limits the production of 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D by inhibiting 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase (reviewed in 8).

Cell differentiation

Cells that are dividing rapidly are said to be proliferating. Differentiation results in the specialization of cells for specific functions. In general, differentiation of cells leads to a decrease in proliferation. While cellular proliferation is essential for growth and wound healing, uncontrolled proliferation of cells with certain mutations may lead to cancer. The active form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D inhibits proliferation and stimulates the differentiation of cells through binding to the VDR (1).


Acting through the VDR, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is a potent immune system modulator. The VDR is expressed by most cells of the immune system, including regulatory T cells and antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells and macrophages (9). Under specific circumstances, monocytes, macrophages, and T cells can express the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase enzyme and produce 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, which acts locally to regulate the immune response (10, 11). There is considerable scientific evidence that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D has a variety of effects on immune system function, which may enhance innate immunity and inhibit the development of autoimmunity (12). Conversely, vitamin D deficiency may compromise the integrity of the immune system and lead to inappropriate immune responses (see Autoimmune diseases).

Insulin secretion

The VDR is expressed by insulin-secreting cells of the pancreas, and the results of animal studies suggest that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D plays a role in insulin secretion under conditions of increased insulin demand (13, 14). Cross-sectional and prospective studies suggest that insufficient vitamin D levels may have an adverse effect on insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in type 2 diabetes (noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) (reviewed in 15).

Blood pressure regulation

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the regulation of blood pressure (16). Renin is an enzyme that catalyzes the cleavage (splitting) of a small peptide (angiotensin I) from a larger protein (angiotensinogen) produced in the liver. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) catalyzes the cleavage of angiotensin I to form angiotensin II, a peptide that can increase blood pressure by inducing the constriction of small arteries and by increasing sodium and water retention. The rate of angiotensin II synthesis is dependent on renin (17). Research in mice lacking the gene encoding the VDR indicates that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D decreases the expression of the gene encoding renin through its interaction with the VDR (18). Since inappropriate activation of the renin-angiotensin system can contribute to the development of hypertension, achieving adequate vitamin D levels may be important for decreasing the risk of high blood pressure (see Hypertension).


In vitamin D deficiency, calcium absorption cannot be increased enough to satisfy the body’s calcium needs (4). Consequently, PTH production by the parathyroid glands is increased and calcium is mobilized from the skeleton to maintain normal serum calcium levels — a condition known as secondary hyperparathyroidism. Although it has long been known that severe vitamin D deficiency has serious consequences for bone health, research suggests that less obvious states of vitamin D deficiency are common and increase the risk of osteoporosis and various other health problems (see Disease Prevention).

Severe vitamin D deficiency


In infants and children, severe vitamin D deficiency results in the failure of bone to mineralize. The process of mineralization, which involves the production of crystals of calcium phosphate by bone-forming cells, determines the hardness and strength of bones. Vitamin D deficiency severely affects rapidly growing bones. The growth plates of bones continue to enlarge, but in the absence of adequate mineralization, weight-bearing limbs (arms and legs) become bowed. In infants, rickets may result in delayed closure of the fontanels (soft spots) in the skull, and the rib cage may become deformed due to the pulling action of the diaphragm. In severe cases, low serum calcium levels (hypocalcemia) may cause seizures. Although fortification of food has led to complacency regarding vitamin D deficiency, nutritional rickets is still being reported throughout the world (19, 20).


Although adult bones are no longer growing, they are in a constant state of turnover, or "remodeling." In adults with severe vitamin D deficiency, the collagenous bone matrix is preserved, but bone mineral is progressively lost, resulting in a softening of bones (osteomalacia), bone pain, and increased risk of osteoporosis (21).

Muscle weakness and pain

Vitamin D deficiency causes muscle weakness and pain in children and adults. Muscle pain and weakness were prominent symptoms of vitamin D deficiency in a study of Arab and Danish Muslim women living in Denmark (22). In a cross-sectional study of 150 consecutive patients referred to a clinic in Minnesota for the evaluation of persistent, nonspecific musculoskeletal pain, 93% had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels equal to or below 20 ng/mL, with a mean concentration of 12.1 ng/mL, which is indicative of vitamin D insufficiency (23). Loss of muscle strength greatly contributes to increased risk of falling and bone fractures, especially in older people (24). In addition, long-term vitamin D insufficiency may be a contributing factor to osteoporosis in the elderly (see Osteoporosis).

Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency

Both environmental factors and cultural practices result in variations in vitamin D status:

  • Environmental conditions: Geographical locations, including latitude and altitudes, and atmospheric conditions (e.g., air pollution, presence of clouds) greatly influence the intensity of UVB radiation that reaches the ground. Seasonal changes also affect the quality and quantity of UVB rays and thus vitamin D production in skin (25, 26).
  • Concealed clothing style: In a study of 2,032 Middle Eastern women, who wore a headscarf or covered all skin for religious or cultural reasons, 96% had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels less than 20 ng/mL, and 60% had vitamin D levels below 12 ng/mL (27). Rickets and osteomalacia are not uncommon in the Middle East and North African regions where children and women cover the majority or all of their skin whenever outside (28).
  • Sun safety measures: Sun protection practices, including limiting sun exposure, wearing protective clothing and hats, and applying sunscreens, hinder skin exposure to sunlight and thus result in lower vitamin D3 production and circulating vitamin D metabolites unless there is adequate oral intake. Of note, the application of sunscreen (2 mg/cm2) with a sun protection factor (SPF) of 10 reduces UVB radiation by 90% (29).
  • Exclusively breast-fed infants: Infants who are exclusively breast-fed and do not receive vitamin D supplementation are at high risk for vitamin D deficiency, particularly if they have dark skin and/or receive little sun exposure (19). Human milk generally provides 10-80 IU of vitamin D per liter (L), which corresponds to 0.2-1.5 μg/day (8-60 IU/day) when using an average daily milk intake of 0.75 L (25 oz) (30). The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all breast-fed and partially breast-fed infants be given an oral vitamin D supplement of 400 IU/day (19). Maternal vitamin D supplementation during breast-feeding may contribute to improved vitamin D status of the breast-fed infant, especially in populations with a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (31). Older infants and toddlers exclusively fed milk substitutes (e.g., soy-based formulas) and weaning foods that are not vitamin D fortified are at risk for vitamin D deficiency (32).

The efficiency of vitamin D synthesis, absorption, and metabolism also depends on a variety of biological factors:

  • Skin pigmentation: People with a dark complexion synthesize less vitamin D on exposure to sunlight than those with light-colored skin (33). A national US survey reported average 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels of 28 ng/mL, 20 ng/mL, and 14 ng/mL in Caucasian, Mexican American, and African American women aged 20 to 39 years old, respectively (34).
  • Genetic variations: Vitamin D bioavailability varies among individuals and is dependent on the level of circulating vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), a carrier protein that binds 85%-90% of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The fraction of circulating serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D that is not bound to DBP can be considered readily bioavailable, i.e., more quickly available to act on target tissues. Serum DBP concentrations are influenced by genetic variations (called polymorphisms) in the sequence of the gene coding for DBP. Thus, for a given level of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the level of bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D will greatly depend on that of DBP. A polymorphism found to be prevalent in African Americans has been recently associated with a lower level of DBP, suggesting that DBP polymorphisms across different ethnical populations may render the measure of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D sometimes inadequate to reflect vitamin D status (35).
  • Older age: The elderly have reduced capacity to synthesize vitamin D in skin when exposed to UVB radiation and are more likely to stay indoors or use sunscreen, which prevents vitamin D synthesis. It has been estimated that across Canada, the US, and Europe, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency ranges between 20%-100% in free-living elderly (36). Moreover, institutionalized adults who are not supplemented with vitamin D are at extremely high risk of vitamin D deficiency (37, 38).
  • Chronic kidney disease (CKD): Vitamin D deficiency in patients with impaired renal function is due to a reduced synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and an increased loss of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in urine (39).
  • Fat malabsorption syndromes: Vitamin D deficiency is common among people with cystic fibrosis and both cholestatic and non-cholestatic liver diseases due to decreased absorption of dietary vitamin D and impaired conversion of vitamin D to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (reviewed in 40).
  • Inflammatory bowel disease: People with inflammatory bowel disease like Crohn's disease appear to be at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency, especially those who have had small bowel resections (41).
  • Obesity: Obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) increases the risk of vitamin D deficiency (42). Once vitamin D is synthesized in the skin or ingested, it can be sequestered in body fat stores, making it less bioavailable to people with higher body fat mass. Moreover, vitamin D supplementation trials have shown that obese people reached much lower levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels compared to normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m2) participants with equivalent oral dosages (43).
  • Magnesium deficiency: Recent findings suggest that high magnesium intakes may reduce the risk of vitamin D insufficiency. Magnesium regulates the activity of critical enzymes in vitamin D metabolism, which would explain how magnesium deficiency negatively affects vitamin D status (44).

Assessing vitamin D nutritional status

Growing awareness that vitamin D insufficiency has serious health consequences beyond rickets and osteomalacia highlights the need for accurate assessment of vitamin D nutritional status. It is currently agreed that the measurement of total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (1 ng/mL corresponding to 2.5 nmol/L) is the best indicator to evaluate vitamin D status. However, high-quality evidence is still needed to ensure that the current cutoff values are optimal to define states of insufficiency and deficiency (36). Although laboratory reference values for sufficient levels of vitamin D have been initially based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels from cohorts of healthy individuals, additional studies have suggested that health-based cutoff values aimed at preventing secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone loss should be considerably higher. Indeed, while it is considered that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations less than 8-10 ng/mL (20-25 nmol/L) indicate severe deficiency associated with rickets and osteomalacia, several studies have observed that PTH levels (45, 46) and calcium absorption (47) were not optimized with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L).

Yet, more recent studies have failed to find threshold values of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in relation to PTH suppression and optimal calcium absorption. On the one hand, the recent cross-sectional analysis of 312,962 clinical samples did not find any evidence of threshold for PTH suppression in the well-fitted curve displaying the inverse association between paired measurements of serum PTH and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, even with 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations beyond 70 ng/mL (175 nmol/L) (48). This contradicted a recent analysis of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003-2006) that estimated maximum PTH suppression for 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of 40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L) and above (49). In addition, both studies identified evidence of mild hyperparathyroidism (serum PTH >65 pg/mL) in individuals with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels well beyond 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), questioning the use of serum PTH as a sensible indicator of vitamin D insufficiency (48, 49). On the other hand, a recent randomized, placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D <20 ng/mL) supplemented with daily vitamin D3 doses from 400 to 4,800 IU found little change (6%) in calcium absorption over a normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration range of 20 to 66 ng/mL (50).

The current cutoffs proposed by the Institute of Medicine are as follows: deficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values ≤12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L); insufficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values of 12-19 ng/mL (30-49 nmol/L); and sufficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values of 20-50 ng/mL (50-125 nmol/L) (51). The dietary reference intakes (EAR, RDA) set by the Institute of Medicine are based on achieving circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations (20-50 ng/mL) that are adequate to maintain bone health and optimal calcium absorption (52). Yet, considering the potential role of circulating levels lower than 30 ng/mL in the burden of many chronic diseases (6), the US Endocrine Society has suggested to define cutoff values as follows: deficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values ≤20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L); insufficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values of 21-29 ng/mL (51-74 nmol/L); sufficiency as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values of 30-100 ng/mL (75-250 nmol/L) (36). Yet, this alternate target range is supported by some observational studies, but it is not based on data from randomized controlled trials (43) (see Disease Prevention). With these latter cutoff values, studies from across the world have estimated that hypovitaminosis D is widespread and that children and adults of all ages are equally at risk of insufficiency and deficiency (53). Data from supplementation studies indicate that vitamin D intakes of at least 800-1,000 IU/day are required by adults living in temperate latitudes to achieve serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of at least 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) (36). Finally, total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations may not always adequately reflect vitamin D bioavailability (35) and additional evidence is needed to improve the determination of vitamin D status in different ethnic populations.

The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)

In 2010, the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) of the Institute of Medicine set a Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) based on the amount of vitamin D needed for bone health. While the RDA was increased from the adequate intake (AI) set in 1997, the optimal levels of recommended intakes and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D to minimize hyperparathyroidism and maximize bone health in the general population remain controversial (36). The RDA for vitamin D is listed in Table 1 by life stage and gender.

Table 1. Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for Vitamin D
Life Stage Age Males Females
μg/day IU/day μg/day IU/day
Infants (AI) 0-6 months
Infants (AI) 6-12 months
Children 1-3 years
Children 4-8 years
Children     9-13 years
Adolescents 14-18 years
Adults 19-70 years
Adults 71 years and older
Pregnancy all ages
Breast-feeding all ages

Disease Prevention


Although the causes of osteoporosis are multifactorial, vitamin D insufficiency can be an important etiological factor in older adults. Osteoporosis affects one-third of women aged 60-70 years and two-thirds of women aged 80 years and above (54). A multinational (18 different countries with latitudes ranging from 64 degrees north to 38 degrees south) survey of more than 2,600 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis revealed that 64% of subjects had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels lower than 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) (55). In addition, in a recent case-control study that included 111 hip fracture patients and 73 controls (median age, 83 years) found low serum levels of both 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin K were associated with an increased risk of hip fracture (56). Without sufficient vitamin D from sun exposure or dietary intake, intestinal calcium absorption can be significantly reduced. This increases PTH secretion by the parathyroid glands; sustained PTH elevation may result in increased bone resorption, which in turn may increase the risk of osteoporotic fracture (57).

A prospective cohort study that followed more than 72,000 postmenopausal women in the US for 18 years found that those who consumed at least 600 IU/day of vitamin D from diet and supplements had a 37% lower risk of osteoporotic hip fracture than women who consumed less than 140 IU/day of vitamin D (58). However, daily supplementation with 400 IU of vitamin D, in combination with 1,000 mg calcium, did not significantly reduce risk of hip fracture compared to a placebo in 36,282 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative trial (59), suggesting that there might be a threshold of vitamin D intake that is necessary to observe reductions in fracture risk. Yet, this study has been questioned for reasons that include poor adherence and the fact that participants were allowed to take additional vitamin D and calcium supplements that might have confounded the results. In addition, use of hormone replacement therapy fails to be considered in the study of the effect of vitamin D and calcium on skeletal health in postmenopausal women despite being a major confounding factor in this population (52, 60). Another trial, the Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D (RECORD) study, reported that oral supplemental vitamin D (800 IU/day) alone, or in combination with calcium (1,000 mg/day), did not prevent the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures in elderly adults who had already experienced a low-trauma, osteoporotic fracture (61). In this latter study as well, a number of limitations, including poor adherence and/or the fact that vitamin D supplementation did not raise serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to a level that would protect against fractures, might explain the lack of an effect (62). Nevertheless, the US Preventive Services Task Force that conducted the meta-analysis of 11 randomized placebo-controlled trials, including 52,915 older people (of whom 69% were postmenopausal women), found that the supplementation of vitamin D (300-1,000 IU/day) and calcium (500-1,200 mg/day) for up to 7 years resulted in a 12% reduction in the risk of any new fracture (63). Another meta-analysis of 11 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on the effect of vitamin D supplementation in 31,022 individuals (91% women) aged 65 years and over indicated that those with the highest vitamin D intake (792-2,000 IU/day) had a 30% lower risk of hip fracture and a 14% lower risk of any non-spine fracture (64). Finally, the latest meta-analysis of trials that examined the effect of combined vitamin D and calcium in preventing fractures in older men and postmenopausal women also concluded that the risk of new fractures, including hip fractures, was significantly reduced in those supplemented compared to controls (65). Interestingly, the three meta-analyses have found that the prevention of fractures by supplemental vitamin D and calcium was limited to institutionalized, older people. However, the risk of fracture was not significantly reduced by vitamin D in community-dwelling seniors (63-65).

The progressive loss of bone mineral density (BMD) leading to osteopenia (pre-osteoporosis) and osteoporosis is commonly observed in older adults, especially the elderly. The results of a recent meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials with more than 4,000 participants (mean age, 59 years) showed little evidence for an effect of vitamin D supplementation on BMD at any of the five skeletal sites examined, including lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter, forearm, and total body. A significant increase in BMD was reported only at the femoral neck (66). It was, however, suggested that individuals in this age group would have adequate levels of calcium and thus normal bone metabolism, explaining the lack of an effect of vitamin D in strengthening bone mass (67). Conversely, in older individuals, vitamin D supplementation is essential to correct and maintain adequate levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism and BMD loss (68).

Overall, the current evidence suggests that vitamin D3 supplements of at least 800 IU/day may be helpful in reducing bone loss and fracture rates in older adults. In order for vitamin D supplementation to be effective in preserving bone health, adequate dietary calcium (1,000 to 1,200 mg/day) should be consumed (see the article on Calcium) (69).


Ecologic studies first suggested an association between Northern latitudes, vitamin D deficiency, and cancer incidence (70). Since the 1980s, several prospective cohort studies have examined the association of vitamin D intake or status and various types of cancer. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 prospective studies, including 137,567 subjects, reported an 11% reduction in total cancer incidence and a 17% reduction in cancer mortality with each 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) increase in circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Yet, a sex-based subgroup analysis of eight studies found an inverse association between circulating vitamin D and cancer mortality in women, but not in men (71). In addition, increasing evidence suggests that a few variations in the gene coding for the vitamin D receptor (VDR) might influence individual vitamin D status and subsequently modify the susceptibility to site-specific cancers (72). Finally, many malignant tumors have been found to express the VDR, including breast, lung, skin (melanoma), colon, and bone (73), suggesting that they might be susceptible to the effects of vitamin D. Numerous experimental studies have demonstrated that biologically active forms of vitamin D, such as 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and its analogs, upon binding to the VDR, can control cell fate by inhibiting proliferation and/or inducing cell differentiation or death (apoptosis) of a number of cancerous cell types (74).

Colorectal cancer

The geographic distribution of colon cancer mortality resembles the historical geographic distribution of rickets (75), providing circumstantial evidence that decreased sunlight exposure and diminished vitamin D nutritional status may be related to an increased risk of colon cancer. There is strong evidence from prospective cohort studies suggesting higher vitamin D intakes and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with reductions in colorectal cancer risk (76-78). Interestingly, early studies found that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were inversely associated with the risk of potentially precancerous colorectal polyps (79) and indices of colonic epithelial cell proliferation (80), two biomarkers for colon cancer. A meta-analysis of four prospective studies and five case-control studies further demonstrated an inverse relationship between circulating vitamin D and incidence of colorectal adenoma (benign tumor that may transform to become malignant). The analysis identified a 27% risk reduction between top vs. bottom quantiles of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (81). However, a seven-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 36,282 postmenopausal women participating in the Women's Health Initiative study found that a combination of supplemental vitamin D (400 IU/day) and calcium (1,000 mg/day) did not lower incidence of colorectal cancer (82). Yet, a daily vitamin D dose of 400 IU may be too low to detect any effect on cancer incidence (83). In fact, a dose-response analysis based on five observational studies estimated that a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level equal to or above 33 ng/mL (compared to ≤12 ng/mL) was associated with a 50% lower risk of colorectal cancer; reaching this threshold generally requires a daily intake of 1,000-2,000 IU of oral vitamin D (84). Additional randomized clinical trials are needed to assess whether vitamin D supplementation could help prevent colorectal cancer. Finally, growing evidence suggests that adequate vitamin D status may be linked to better survival of colorectal cancer patients. A meta-analysis of five prospective studies found a 35% reduced risk of colorectal cancer-specific mortality in cancer patients with higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. A dose-response analysis estimated that every 8 ng/mL increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was associated with a 10% decrease in colorectal cancer mortality (85).

Breast cancer

Together with ecologic evidence that breast cancer mortality rises with increasing latitudes and decreasing sunlight exposure, the most current observational data support an association between vitamin D nutritional status and breast cancer (86). An early prospective study of women who participated in the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) found that Caucasian women with adequate sunlight exposure and dietary vitamin D intake had a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer 20 years later (87). A 16-year study of more than 88,000 women observed that higher intakes of vitamin D were associated with significantly lower breast cancer risk in premenopausal women but not postmenopausal women (88). More recently, a meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies, including 7,550 breast cancer cases and 8,790 controls, found a significant reduction in the risk of breast cancer (39% lower risk) in women in the top vs. bottom quintiles of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (≥33 ng/mL vs. ≤13.6 ng/mL). A pooled, dose-response analysis found that women with a 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 44 ng/mL (110 nmol/L) experienced a 50% lower risk of developing breast cancer compared to those with levels lower than 9.7 ng/mL (24 nmol/L) (89). While the current RDA of 600-800 IU/day of vitamin D may only raise serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels by 4-6 ng/mL, authors of one study estimated that 2,000 to 4,000 IU of vitamin D might be needed to achieve a level of 44 ng/mL (89). Of note, the current tolerable upper intake level (UL) for adults, set by the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, is 4,000 IU/day (see Safety). A more recent meta-analysis of 14 observational studies (9,110 cases and 16,244 controls) reported an overall risk reduction of 16% when the highest quantile of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels was compared to the lowest. This inverse association was statistically significant in postmenopausal women but not in premenopausal women (90). Further, increasing evidence suggests that specific genetic variations in the gene coding for the VDR may influence the risk of breast cancer (91). VDR expression in breast cancer samples from 82 postmenopausal women was recently correlated with favorable clinical prognostic indicators and significantly better survival (92).

A recent meta-analysis of studies conducted in patients in the early stage of breast cancer also identified associations between inadequate vitamin D status and increased risks of recurrence and death (93). Evidence from randomized controlled trials is currently too limited to conclude whether vitamin D supplementation may reduce breast cancer incidence (reviewed in 94).

Other types of cancer

Evidence associating vitamin D status with other types of cancer is currently limited. While incidence of prostate cancer appears to be inversely associated with the availability of sunlight, prospective studies have not generally found significant relationships between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and subsequent risk of developing prostate cancer (95, 96). However, a few studies suggested an increased risk of prostate cancer with higher circulating vitamin D levels. A nested case-control study of men (622 cases and 1,451 controls) from Scandinavia found a U-shaped relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and prostate cancer risk. In that study, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of 7.6 ng/mL or lower, or 32 ng/mL or higher, were associated with increased prostate cancer risk (97). In another nested case-control study, the risk of aggressive disease was increased in prostate cancer patients with higher levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (98). Finally, in the few and often heterogeneous studies published to date, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were not associated with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (96), ovarian cancer (99), or skin cancers (100).

Autoimmune diseases

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 1 diabetes mellitus), multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are examples of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune diseases occur when the body mounts an immune response against its own tissue, rather than a foreign pathogen. In type 1 diabetes mellitus, insulin-producing β-cells of the pancreas are the target of an inappropriate immune response. In MS, the targets are the myelin-producing cells of the central nervous system, and in RA, the targets are the collagen-producing cells of the joints (101). SLE is characterized by the presence of a large spectrum of autoantibodies resulting in potential damage to multiple tissues (102). Autoimmune responses are mediated by immune cells called T cells. The biologically active form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, has been found to modulate T cell responses, such that the autoimmune responses are diminished. Ecologic studies have found that the prevalence of autoimmune diseases (particularly for MS (103)) increases as latitude increases, suggesting that lower exposure to UVB radiation and associated decreases in skin vitamin D synthesis may play a role in the pathology of these diseases. Results of several prospective cohort studies also suggest that adequate vitamin D status at different ages (including in utero, early childhood, and during adolescence) could possibly decrease the risk of autoimmune diseases.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Lower levels of circulating vitamin D have been reported in patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes compared to age- and sex-matched non-diabetic subjects (104, 105). A greater prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency has also been observed in pre-diabetic children who developed multiple islet autoantibodies (antibodies against insulin-secreting pancreatic cells) compared to autoantibody-negative children. However, a prospective study that followed the cohort of pre-diabetic children found that their vitamin D status, defined as either insufficient, deficient, or sufficient, was not associated with rate of progression to type 1 diabetes after 5 or 10 years of follow up (106). An earlier prospective cohort study of children born in Finland during the year 1966 and followed for 30 years found that children supplemented with vitamin D during the first year of life had an 88% lower risk of developing type 1 diabetes compared to those receiving no supplementation. Moreover, children suspected of having had rickets (severe vitamin D deficiency) during the first year of life showed a significantly higher risk of developing type 1 diabetes (107). Thus, vitamin D supplementation appears protective against type 1 diabetes onset, and sub-optimal vitamin D status in infancy may have long-term effects on immune responses later in life.

There are also limited data suggesting maternal vitamin D insufficiency during pregnancy may influence the risk of type 1 diabetes in offspring. In a recent case-control study, the risk of childhood onset of type 1 diabetes was more than two-fold greater in children whose mothers had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 21.6 ng/mL (54 nmol/L) during the last trimester of pregnancy compared to children born from women with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D above 35.6 ng/mL (89 nmol/L) (108). Other case-control studies have found that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of their children developing diabetes-related autoantibodies (109, 110). However, a larger study conducted in mothers of children at increased genetic risk for diabetes reported no association between the appearance of islet autoantibodies and/or diabetes onset in offspring in the first year of life and maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy (111). Another case-control study failed to observe a relationship between serum 25-dihydroxyvitamin D during early pregnancy and type 1 diabetes diagnosis in offspring (112). Large prospective studies are needed to establish whether maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy can influence the risk of type 1 diabetes in offspring.

Finally, the relationship of polymorphisms in vitamin D metabolism-related genes and type 1 diabetes is currently under investigation. It has been proposed that specific polymorphisms in genes, such as CYP27B1 (coding for 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase) and VDR, may be functionally relevant to the action of vitamin D and may thus affect disease susceptibility. In a study conducted in 8,517 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and 7,320 control subjects, polymorphisms in genes involved in cholesterol synthesis and vitamin D hydroxylation were linked to circulating vitamin D levels and diabetic status (25).

Multiple sclerosis

Low levels of sun exposure and vitamin D deficiency appear to be associated with the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). Poor vitamin D status may compromise the function of specific immune cells critical in the regulation of various immune responses and help trigger autoimmunity in MS (113). Several observational studies suggest vitamin D sufficiency is associated with a decreased MS risk. A retrospective study of levels of ambient UV radiation and cases of MS conducted in Australia revealed that MS incidence in offspring was inversely correlated to maternal exposure to UV during early pregnancy (114). Sun exposure was also used as a surrogate marker for vitamin D exposure in a recent case-control study that included 1,660 MS patients and 3,050 controls. The authors found that infrequent outdoor activities and the use of sunscreen during early childhood and adolescence were associated with a significant increase in risk of developing MS later in life (115). In a cross-sectional study, sun exposure and intake of cod liver oil (rich in vitamin D) during childhood were linked to later symptom onset among veterans with relapsing MS (116). Additionally, a case-control study in US military personnel, including 257 cases of diagnosed MS, found that Caucasian subjects in the highest quintile of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (>39.6 ng/mL) had a 62% lower risk of developing MS compared to the lowest quintile (<25.3 ng/mL) (117). Further, in two large cohorts of over 187,000 US women followed for at least 10 years, vitamin D supplement use (≥400 IU/day) was associated with a 41% reduction in the risk of developing MS (118).

However, two recent clinical trials have failed to demonstrate any benefit of vitamin D supplementation, alone or in combination with interferon β treatment, with respect to relapse rates and disability-related symptoms in MS patients (119, 120). Yet, in a multicenter study conducted in patients newly diagnosed with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and treated with interferon β, vitamin D status was predictive of MS disease activity and progression. Higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (≥20 ng/mL or 50 nmol/L) in the first year following CIS diagnosis predicted a longer time to MS diagnosis, lower number of new lesions, and lower changes in lesion and brain volume during the subsequent four years of follow-up (121).

Rheumatoid arthritis

Vitamin D deficiency may also be implicated in the etiology and/or progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although evidence is mainly from animal studies. The absence of vitamin D receptors (VDR) in genetically modified mice has been linked to higher levels of inflammation and increased susceptibility to autoimmunity (122). When transgenic mice that spontaneously develop inflammatory arthritis are also deficient in VDR, they develop a more aggressive form of chronic arthritis (123). Also, specific polymorphisms in the VDR gene have been linked to an increased susceptibility to RA in certain populations, although how these genetic variants influence vitamin D functionality is not fully understood (124-126). The current data, however, point to a role for vitamin D in modulating the inflammatory process that underlies many chronic diseases, including RA. Several cross-sectional studies in individuals with moderate-to-high levels of inflammation have reported either no association or an inverse association between circulating 25-dihydroxyvitamin D and markers of inflammation. Nonetheless, there is a lack of intervention trials to show whether vitamin D supplementation could limit inflammation and reduce disease risk (including RA) in subjects with high inflammation levels (127).

At this time, it remains unclear whether the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is linked to RA incidence. In a large cohort study of nearly 30,000 postmenopausal US women, subjects with the highest total vitamin D intakes (≥467.7 IU/day) had a 33% lower risk of developing RA after 11 years of follow-up than those with the lowest intakes (<221.4 IU/day) (128). Yet, more recent analyses of two large cohorts of nearly 200,000 US women followed for several decades found no association between reported vitamin D dietary intakes (using food frequency questionnaires) during adolescence or adulthood and incidence of RA later in life (129, 130). Moreover, several studies that explored the relationship between circulating vitamin D and disease activity in RA patients have reported mixed results (reviewed in 131). Finally, there is a dearth of studies exploring the effect of vitamin D supplementation on disease activity in arthritis subjects. A small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 22 RA patients failed to demonstrate improvements in disease activity and inflammation level in subjects supplemented with calcium (1,500 mg/day) and high doses of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol; averaging over 4,500 IU/day) for a year compared to placebo (132). Since this study has several limitations, including small sample size, additional research is warranted.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

More prevalent and severe in non-Caucasian populations (Hispanics, African descendants, and Asians) (133), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. The disease can potentially affect most tissues and organs, including skin (skin rash and photosensitivity), kidneys (nephritis), and joints (arthritis). There is evidence of a role for vitamin D in the prevention of SLE in animal models (134). Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies found that specific VDR polymorphisms were linked to SLE in Asians particularly (135). However, the functional relevance of such genetic variants is not known (136). Analyses of two large prospective cohort studies of nearly 200,000 US women failed to show an association between dietary vitamin D intake (measured by food frequency questionnaire) during the adolescence or adulthood and incidence of SLE later in life (129, 130). Yet, a sub-optimum vitamin D status is commonly observed in subjects with SLE, and this is partly explained by the lack of sunlight exposure, which tends to aggravate disease symptoms (137, 138). Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were inversely correlated with measures of disease activity in a cohort of 378 patients with SLE (139). The correction of vitamin D insufficiency with high levels of vitamin D3 (100,000 IU/week for one month followed by 100,000 IU/month for six months) in 20 subjects with SLE was linked to a reduction in signs of immune imbalance and in levels of autoantibodies typically detected in SLE, suggesting a therapeutic value for vitamin D in disease treatment (140). Another prospective study conducted in 52 vitamin D-deficient patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (a type of lupus with skin disorders only) reported a reduction in disease severity in the group supplemented with vitamin D3 (1,400 IU/day initially, followed by 800 IU/day) and calcium for a year compared to untreated patients (141). Supplementation with vitamin D3 (200 IU/day for one year) was also able to reduce the level of inflammatory cytokines in a randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted in 267 patients with SLE (142). The safety and efficacy of oral vitamin D supplementation in SLE are currently being investigated in clinical trials (143).

Thus, evidence from human epidemiological studies suggests that while it cannot yet be concluded that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in prevention or treatment of autoimmune disease, it is reasonable to assume that correcting vitamin D insufficiency and maintaining sufficient levels could possibly help decrease disease risk (144).

Cardiovascular disease

Hypertension (high blood pressure)

Hypertension is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) (145). The results of observational and clinical studies suggest a role for vitamin D in lowering blood pressure, which may be partly explained by the fact that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D inhibits renin synthesis (see Function). Thus, vitamin D deficiency and subsequent up-regulation of the renin-angiotensin system may contribute to high blood pressure and CVD risk. It has also been suggested that elevated PTH levels may increase the risk of hypertension and CVD (6). Yet, in a recent prospective study of 3,002 individuals (aged 59 years at baseline), the incidence of hypertension, which affected 41% of participants during the nine-year follow-up period, was not higher in those with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels lower than 20 ng/mL and was only marginally associated with elevated PTH levels (146). Nevertheless, a meta-analysis of seven prospective studies, including a total of 48,633 participants with nearly 5,000 incident hypertension cases, found a 30% lower risk of hypertension in those in the top vs. bottom tertiles of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. The dose-response analysis estimated that every 10 ng/mL increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was associated with a 12% lower risk of hypertension (147). Another meta-analysis of 4 prospective and 14 cross-sectional studies also reported an inverse relationship between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and hypertension (148).

Endothelial dysfunction

Vascular endothelium dysfunction, which contributes to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (149). In CKD patients, abnormal endothelial function is associated with low values of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, a surrogate marker of vascular health. In a recent study conducted in subjects with mild-to-moderate CKD, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were positively associated with FMD values, suggesting a link between sub-optimal vitamin D status and endothelial dysfunction (150). In a preliminary intervention study, 26 patients with moderate CKD and vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency were supplemented twice with 300,000 IU of vitamin D3 (at weeks 1 and 8) and followed for a total of 16 weeks. Vitamin D supplementation nearly doubled serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and decreased PTH levels by 68.5%; improved vitamin D status was accompanied by increased FMD values and reduced levels of endothelial dysfunction markers (151).

To date, the many epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between vitamin D and outcomes of CVD have provided mixed results (reviewed in 152). Intervention trials in people with impaired kidney function or in the general population are too limited to assess the efficacy of vitamin D therapy in CVD prevention. Data on the effect of calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular events were recently collected from 11 randomized controlled studies and combined in a meta-analysis. No effect of vitamin D was reported for major cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (heart attack) and stroke. Subgroup analysis suggested an increased risk of cardiovascular events with calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation in men but not in women. However, caution is advised with the interpretation of the results since the trials were initially designed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D (and calcium) on bone health, and cardiovascular outcomes were not primary endpoints (153). Two large, randomized controlled trials exploring the effect of vitamin D supplementation on CVD risk are currently under way: the ViDA (Vitamin D Assessment) in New Zealand and the VITAL (Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial) in the US (154).

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

People with metabolic syndrome are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes (noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Metabolic syndrome refers to several metabolic disorders, including dyslipidemia, hypertension, insulin resistance, and obesity. A recent study found that the prevalence of type 2 diabetes was associated with suboptimal levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (<30 ng/mL) in 1,801 patients with metabolic syndrome. During an eight-year follow-up period, lower risks of all-cause mortality (72% lower risk) and CVD-specific mortality (64% lower risk) were reported in individuals with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels over 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) when compared to those with levels below 10 ng/mL (25 nmol/L) (155).

In healthy people, vitamin D sufficiency is positively correlated with insulin sensitivity and adequate pancreatic β-cell function. Conversely, vitamin D deficiency might affect glucose homeostasis and cause impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance (156). In a cross-sectional study conducted in 12,719 adults, of whom 4,057 had prediabetes (i.e., an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes), the prevalence of prediabetes was associated with lower levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (≤32.4 ng/mL). Subjects with the lowest levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (≤17.7 ng/mL) were more likely to be current smokers, obese, and have hypertension (157). Vitamin D insufficiency in high-risk individuals may accelerate the progression to overt diabetes. In a prospective study of 2,378 middle-aged men and women followed for 8 to 10 years, the risk for progression to type 2 diabetes from prediabetes was 62% lower in women and 60% lower in men in the highest compared to the lowest quartile of circulating vitamin D (>28.4 ng/mL vs. <18.5 ng/mL). A dose-response analysis measured an average 23% reduction in the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes for every 4 ng/mL (10 nmol/L) increment in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (158). A recent review and meta-analysis of 18 prospective studies, including over 210,000 participants followed for a median period of 10 years, found that individuals in the top third of vitamin D levels (reported as either circulating vitamin D or dietary intakes) had lower risks of developing type 2 diabetes (19% lower risk) and metabolic syndrome (14% lower risk) compared to those in the bottom third (159). Currently, limited evidence suggests that vitamin D supplementation may improve insulin sensitivity in individuals with glucose intolerance or manifest type 2 diabetes (160, 161). There is a need for well-designed clinical trials to examine whether maintaining adequate vitamin D levels can prevent adverse metabolic outcomes in healthy and at-risk individuals.

Neurodegenerative diseases

Cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by the presence of extra-neuronal β-amyloid plaques and intra-neuronal Τ protein aggregates (known as neurofibrillary tangles) in the brain. Mechanistic models currently investigated in animal research suggest that vitamin D deficiency or disorders of vitamin D metabolism and/or the disruption of the vitamin D-VDR pathway in the cerebral regions of the cortex and hippocampus may be involved in the degeneration of neurons and loss of cognitive functions (162). Experimental evidence supporting a role for vitamin D in calcium channel regulation, neuroprotection, and immunomodulation in the central nervous system also implies that low vitamin D status may precede or contribute to cognitive dysfunction with age (163).

In humans, poor vitamin D dietary intakes and low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels have been linked to cognitive decline and degenerative brain disease in the elderly. Several observational studies have found an association between low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and mild cognitive impairment in older adults (164-166). The cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of two prospective studies, which included 1,604 men (167) and 6,257 women (168) aged 65 and over, reported a 60% greater odds of cognitive impairment at baseline and a 58% increased risk of cognitive decline during a four-year follow-up period in women, but not in men, with lower levels of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (<10 ng/mL vs. ≥30 ng/mL). In a large French cohort study on osteoporosis and hip fractures in postmenopausal women, impairments in global cognitive performance, assessed with the Pfeiffer Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire (SPMSQ), were associated with lower dietary intakes of vitamin D (<1,400 IU/week vs. ≥1,400 IU/week) in 5,596 elderly women (mean age 80.5 years) (165). A seven-year follow-up study of a subgroup of 498 women indicated that the risk of Alzheimer's disease (but not other types of dementia) was 77% lower in those in the highest vs. the lowest quintiles of vitamin D dietary intakes at baseline (169). Yet, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies have given mixed results regarding the association of vitamin D status with cognitive performance and AD (170-173).

Nevertheless, the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency ranges between 70% and 90% in older adults, and correcting low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D may help improve cognitive processes, in particular executive functions (174). In a small non-randomized controlled study in an outpatient clinic, global cognitive function was assessed at baseline and after 16 months in 20 patients supplemented with 800 IU/day (or 100,000 IU/month) of vitamin D and in 24 control subjects. The supplementation of outpatients with vitamin D resulted in the correction of low vitamin D status (average serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at baseline and at 16 months: 16.8 ng/mL to 30 ng/mL) and was associated with a significantly improved scoring in cognition tests compared to the non-supplemented group (175). In a small randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 32 mild-to-moderate AD patients receiving nasal insulin, high doses of vitamin D2 supplementation for eight weeks (up to 36,000 IU/day) did not significantly improve cognitive performance compared to low doses (1,000 IU/day) (176). More research is needed to investigate a causal relationship between vitamin D repletion and potential long-term cognitive benefits in older adults. Further, it is of great importance to evaluate whether correcting vitamin D deficiency in cognitively impaired subjects can improve the impact of anti-dementia therapy (177).

Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) has been associated with a high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among patients, especially those with greater mobility problems (178). A case-control study of 296 outpatients with a mean age of 65 years indicated that 55% of PD subjects had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels equal to or lower than 30 ng/mL compared to 41.2% and 36.4% of AD and healthy individuals, respectively (179). In another study, vitamin D insufficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D <30 ng/mL) was found in up to 69% of patients with early, non-disabling PD (180). The association between vitamin D status and risk of incident PD was assessed in a prospective study conducted among 3,173 men and women aged 50-79 years and free of PD at baseline. The results showed that individuals in the highest quartile of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D had a 67% lower risk of PD compared to those in the lowest quartile (181). In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 112 PD patients (mean age, 72 years) on standard PD treatment were supplemented with 1,200 IU/day of vitamin D or a placebo for 12 months. Vitamin D supplementation more than doubled the levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (from mean of 22.5 ng/mL to 41.7 ng/mL) in supplemented subjects and limited the progression of PD, as indicated by a greater proportion of patients who showed no worsening (as assessed by the Hoehn and Yahr stage and the United Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part II) in the supplemented group compared to the placebo group (182). It is not known whether vitamin D insufficiency has a role in the pathogenesis of the disease, but the repletion of vitamin D may provide health benefits that go beyond the prevention and/or the treatment of PD. For example, vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the increased risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture in individuals with neurologic disorders, including PD and multiple sclerosis (183-185). Interestingly, sunlight exposure was found to be associated with improved vitamin D status, higher bone mineral density of the second metacarpal bone, and lower incidence of hip fracture in a prospective study conducted in 324 elderly people with PD (186).

Adverse pregnancy outcomes

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 observational studies on maternal vitamin D status and pregnancy outcomes indicated that vitamin D insufficiency may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Low maternal serum vitamin D during pregnancy was also linked to an increased risk for small-for-gestational age infants and low-birth-weight infants, but not for Cesarean section (187). However, the number of intervention trials is currently too limited to draw conclusions as to whether vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy might reduce the incidence of the above-mentioned adverse outcomes (188, 189). In addition, a few observational studies have given rather weak evidence in support of a relationship between maternal vitamin D sufficiency during pregnancy and incidence of respiratory conditions and allergies in children (190, 191). A recent randomized controlled trial found that the supplementation of 108 pregnant women in the third trimester (at week 27 of gestation until delivery) with either 800 IU/day or a bolus dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3 did not decrease the risk of wheezing, allergic rhinitis, food allergy diagnosis, lower respiratory tract infections, and eczema in offspring at three years of age, compared to placebo (N=50) (192). In a cohort of 378 mother-child pairs, high serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels measured during in the 34th week of pregnancy were associated with an increase in food allergy of the child during the first two years of life, suggesting that the safety of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy needs to be carefully evaluated (193).

Since vitamin D insufficiency has been linked to autoimmunity (see Autoimmune diseases), it has also been proposed that poor maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy may contribute to an increased risk of autoimmune diabetes (insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes mellitus) in the offspring. Yet, the results of a study of 3,723 children at high genetic risk for type 1 diabetes and followed for a mean 4.3 year-period found that maternal intake of vitamin D (from food and/or supplements) during the third trimester of pregnancy (assessed through food frequency questionnaires) was not associated with advanced β-cell autoimmunity or clinical diabetes (111). In a nested case-control study, there was no difference in mean serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D during the first trimester of pregnancy between 343 mothers of children with type 1 diabetes and 343 control mothers. No association was found between serum vitamin D levels and the age of onset of diabetes in children (112).

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Abnormal hyperglycemia due to pancreatic β-cell dysfunction characterizes the onset of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women without known type 2 diabetes mellitus. This condition is associated with serious adverse maternal outcomes, including preeclampsia, high risk of Cesarean delivery, and life-long increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. GDM may also contribute to increased risks of fetal macrosomia (excessive birth weight), neonatal hypoglycemia, infant respiratory distress, and increased life-long risk for obesity, glucose intolerance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease in the offspring (reviewed in 194). A recent prospective study conducted in 655 pregnant women found that the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level during the first trimester of pregnancy was significantly lower in 54 women who developed incident GDM compared to the rest of the cohort (23 ng/mL vs. 25.4 ng/mL). After multiple adjustments for confounding factors of vitamin D status and GDM risk (including prior history of type 2 diabetes and GDM, and overweight/obesity), the study found each 7.5 ng/mL decrease in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level during early pregnancy was associated with a 48% higher risk of developing GDM (195). There was also a significant association between low level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (<29.4 ng/mL) during the second trimester of pregnancy and incidence of GDM in a nested case-control study in 118 women with GDM and 219 matched control subjects (196). A meta-analysis of earlier observational studies (three cross-sectional, two case-control, and two nested case-control studies), including 2,146 participants of whom 433 had GDM, also confirmed that maternal vitamin D level during pregnancy was inversely related to the risk of developing GDM, despite evidence of bias amongst studies, such as the use of different methods for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement, measures done in different trimesters, and different criteria to assess GDM (197).

Further, evidence for the role of vitamin D in glucose regulation during pregnancy was recently reported in a small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 54 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM. The supplementation with 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 twice during a six-week period (at day 1 and day 21) resulted in significantly lower fasting plasma glucose and serum insulin concentration, reduced insulin resistance, and improved insulin sensitivity compared to placebo (198). This suggests that vitamin D deficiency may adversely affect glucose tolerance during pregnancy and contribute to the onset of GDM. Yet, the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of glucose intolerance and GDM during pregnancy have not been assessed. Of note, a multi-centered, randomized, controlled trial is ongoing in Europe to evaluate the effects of vitamin D and lifestyle interventions (healthy eating and physical activity) on the metabolic status of pregnant women at risk of GDM (inclusion criteria: pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 29 kg/m2) (199).

Acute respiratory infections

More than 200 viruses are responsible for causing familiar infections of the upper respiratory tract (URT), known as the common cold, resulting in symptoms of nasal congestion and discharge, cough, sore throat, and sneezing (200). The analysis of cross-sectional data from 18,883 participants (aged 12 years and older) of the Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) reported an inverse relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and recent (self-reported) URT infection (URTI). Compared to levels of circulating vitamin D equal to and above 30 ng/mL, the risk of URTI was 24% higher in individuals with levels between 10 and 29 ng/mL and 36% higher in those with levels below 10 ng/mL (201). A subgroup analysis indicated that low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in subjects with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was linked to a greater susceptibility to URTI when compared to people without pulmonary disease. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 322 healthy adults (aged 18 years and over), monthly doses of vitamin D3 — 200,000 IU for the first 2 months and 100,000 IU for the following 16 months — significantly raised the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (from 29 ng/mL to 48 ng/mL) in the intervention group but did not decrease the occurrence of URTI compared to placebo (202). Interestingly, the pooled analysis of these data with that of 10 additional trials suggested that large bolus doses of vitamin D may be significantly less effective than daily supplementation with lower doses in the prevention of URTI (203). The meta-analysis also reported an overall protective effect of vitamin D3 with a 36% reduction in URTI risk.

However, in a recent, multicenter, four-arm clinical trial in 2,259 subjects (aged 45-75 years) with a history of colorectal adenoma, daily vitamin D3 supplementation of 1,000 IU did not reduce the number or the duration of URTI episodes during winter and the rest of the year, even among participants with the lowest serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at baseline (204). In addition, the post-hoc analysis of data from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 644 individuals (aged 60-84 years) found that monthly supplementation with 30,000 IU or 60,000 IU of vitamin D3 for a maximum period of one year did not significantly decrease the rate of antibiotic prescriptions for bacterial airway infections. The stratified analysis, however, found that doses of 60,000 IU/month reduced the risk of using antibiotics in participants aged 70 and older by 47% (205). Finally, compared to placebo, the supplementation of pregnant women with vitamin D3 (with 2,000 IU/day) for 3 months until birth followed by the supplementation of their infants (800 IU/day) from birth to age 6 months significantly reduced the number of acute respiratory infections after the intervention period, in children aged 6-18 months (206). The results of two ongoing large randomized clinical trials — the ViDA (Vitamin D Assessment) and the VITAL (Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial) — examining the prevention of infectious diseases (as a secondary outcome) may provide more definitive evidence of an effect of vitamin D on the risk of airway infections (207).

Disease Treatment

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis or eczema is particularly prevalent in industrialized countries, affecting 10%-20% of children and 1%-3% of adults. Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by dry and pruritus (itchy) areas of the skin in affected subjects. Local skin inflammation and immune dysfunction can damage the epidermal barrier and increase the susceptibility to skin infections and atopic reactions in affected individuals. The disease is often associated with other atopic diseases, including food allergies, asthma, and allergic rhinitis (208). Although the etiology of the disease is not fully elucidated, vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the onset and/or the severity of the disease (209). It has thus been suggested that vitamin D may be an effective adjunct tool in disease management through regulating local inflammatory reactions and stimulating antimicrobial activities in the skin. Moreover, the beneficial effect of phototherapy observed in specific cases of atopic dermatitis may be partly mediated by the action of vitamin D (208). In a small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 45 patients with atopic dermatitis and low vitamin D status (70% of subjects had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <20 ng/mL), daily administration of 1,600 IU of oral vitamin D3, alone or together with 600 IU of vitamin E, for a period of 60 days significantly reduced the extent and intensity of eczema, as assessed by the SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) score (210). Vitamin D3 (1,600 IU/day for 60 days) also improved vitamin D status and reduced disease severity in 53 patients with atopic dermatitis in another small randomized trial (211). Larger trials are needed to strengthen these preliminary findings and determine the most appropriate and effective supplementation regimen. Of note, topical treatment of psoriasis with vitamin D analogs has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and may be effective in the management of other skin disorders (212).

Inflammatory bowel diseases

Several ill-defined environmental and genetic factors are thought to contribute to the development of the inappropriate immune response to the intestinal microbiota that causes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). While specific VDR polymorphisms may be linked to an increased susceptibility to developing UC and CD (213), higher vitamin D intakes and predicted circulating levels were found to be associated with a reduced incidence of UC and CD in a large cohort of 72,719 women (214). Two recent studies have investigated whether vitamin D3 could benefit patients with CD, possibly through reducing intestinal inflammation. In one multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the relapse rate in CD patients in remission after one year of treatment was lower in those supplemented daily with 1,200 IU of vitamin D3 and 1,200 mg of calcium compared to those who received calcium alone (13% vs. 29%), but statistical significance was not reached (p=0.06) (215). In a second pilot study, incremental daily doses of vitamin D3, from 1,000 IU up to 5,000 IU, were administrated over a 24-week period to 18 CD patients in order to achieve circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels above 40 ng/mL. Although half of the patients failed to achieve 40 ng/mL, the mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was raised to 45 ng/mL (from a baseline mean of 16 ng/mL), and the overall improvement in vitamin D status was associated with a significant decrease in disease severity as assessed by Crohn’s Disease Activity (CDAI) scores (216). Additional studies are needed to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of vitamin D in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Cardiovascular disease

The prospective analysis of 41,504 electronic medical records in the Intermountain Heart Collaborative study found that only one-third of patients had adequate serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (>30 ng/mL); vitamin D insufficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≤30 ng/mL) was associated with increased prevalence and incidence of many cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and stroke (217). Sub-optimal vitamin D status has also been linked to arterial stiffness and vascular endothelial dysfunction — strong determinants of incident hypertension and adverse cardiovascular outcomes (218).


Several intervention studies have evaluated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on high blood pressure. An early controlled clinical trial in 18 men and women with untreated mild hypertension living in the Netherlands found that exposure to UVB radiation three times weekly for six weeks during the winter increased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels by 162%, lowered PTH levels by 15%, and decreased 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements by an average of 6 mm Hg (219). A recent meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials involving 1,879 participants, either healthy or with pre-existing cardiometabolic conditions (including hypertension), found no significant reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures with vitamin D supplementation (800-8,571 IU/day for five weeks to one year). However, a subgroup analysis of six trials found a significant reduction of 1.31 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure in individuals with pre-existing conditions. While improvements in blood pressure may be expected in cases of vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency, the authors noted that sub-optimal vitamin D levels in participants were not exclusively observed in those with cardiometabolic conditions (220).

Conditions that decrease vitamin D synthesis in the skin, such as having dark-colored skin, living in temperate latitudes, and aging, are associated with increased prevalence of hypertension (221), suggesting that vitamin D may reduce blood pressure levels in selected groups of individuals. In the above-mentioned meta-analysis, one four-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 283 African Americans randomized to receive daily vitamin D supplements of 1,000 IU, 2,000 IU, or 4,000 IU for a period of three months. Systolic blood pressure was decreased by 0.66 mm Hg with 1,000 IU/day, 3.4 mm Hg with 2,000 IU/day, and by 4 mm Hg with 4,000 IU/day while it increased by 1.7 mm Hg in the placebo group when compared to baseline. A significant reduction of 0.2 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure was detected per 1 ng/mL incremental increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (222). However, another randomized, placebo-controlled study in 150 elderly participants (mean age, 77 years) showed that supplementation with 100,000 IU of vitamin D every three months for one year did not significantly lower blood pressure compared to placebo (223). Further research is needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation is helpful in the prevention or management of hypertension.

Congestive heart failure

Congestive heart failure (also called cardiac insufficiency) is characterized by increased heart rate and subsequent hypertrophy of the left heart ventricle. Cardiac insufficiency is associated with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed by echocardiography. Inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) (see Blood pressure regulation) are currently used as first-line therapy for patients with heart failure. Interestingly, in a recent cross-sectional study in healthy patients who underwent coronary angiography, insufficient serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (defined as <30 ng/mL) were associated with poorer coronary flow rates (224). Results of vitamin D supplementation studies in those with cardiac insufficiency are only preliminary. In a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, daily supplementation with 1,200 IU of vitamin D in children with chronic congestive heart failure led to a significant increase in vitamin D status accompanied by an improved heart muscle performance (increased LVEF), as well as by lower levels of PTH and pro-inflammatory cytokines (225). In another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 64 elderly patients with heart failure, participants receiving 800 mg/day of calcium and 50,000 IU/week of vitamin D did not perform significantly better at physical performance tasks (used as proxy to assess aerobic capacity and skeletal muscle strength) compared to those supplemented with calcium only (226).



Solar ultraviolet-B radiation (UVB; wavelengths of 290 to 315 nanometers) stimulates the production of vitamin D3 in the epidermis of the skin (227). Sunlight exposure can provide most people with their entire vitamin D requirement. Children and young adults who spend a short time outside two or three times a week will generally synthesize all the vitamin D they need to prevent deficiency. One study reported that serum vitamin D concentrations following exposure to one minimal erythemal dose of simulated sunlight (the amount required to cause a slight pinkness of the skin) to the whole body was equivalent to ingesting approximately 10,000 to 25,000 IU of vitamin D (228). People with dark-colored skin synthesize markedly less vitamin D on exposure to sunlight than those with lighter complexion (33). Additionally, older adults have diminished capacity to synthesize vitamin D from sunlight exposure and frequently use sunscreen or protective clothing in order to prevent skin cancer and sun damage. The application of sunscreen with an SPF factor of 10 reduces production of vitamin D by 90% (29). In latitudes around 40 degrees north or 40 degrees south (Boston is 42 degrees north), there is insufficient UVB radiation available for vitamin D synthesis from November to early March. Ten degrees farther north or south (Edmonton, Canada), the "vitamin D winter" extends from mid-October to mid-March. It has been estimated that up to 15 minutes of daily sun exposure on the hands, arms, and face around 12 pm throughout the year at 25 degrees latitude (Miami, FL) and during the spring, summer, and fall at 42 degrees (Boston, MA) latitude may provide a light-skinned individual with 1,000 IU of vitamin D (229).

Food sources

Vitamin D is found naturally in only a few foods, such as some fatty fish (mackerel, salmon, sardines), fish liver oils, and eggs from hens that have been fed vitamin D. In the US, milk and infant formula are fortified with vitamin D so that they contain 400 IU (10 μg) per quart. However, other dairy products, such as cheese and yogurt, are not always fortified with vitamin D. Some cereals and breads are also fortified with vitamin D. Fruit juices fortified with vitamin D are also available in the US. Accurate estimates of average dietary intakes of vitamin D are difficult because of the high variability of the vitamin D content of fortified foods (230). The vitamin D content of some vitamin D-rich foods is listed in Table 2 in both international units (IU) and micrograms (μg). For more information on the nutrient content of specific foods, search the USDA food composition database.

Table 2. Some Food Sources of Vitamin D
Food Serving Vitamin D (IU) Vitamin D (μg)
Pink salmon, canned 3 ounces 465 11.6
Mackerel, canned 3 ounces 211 5.3
Sardines, canned 3 ounces 164 4.1
Quaker Nutrition for Women Instant Oatmeal 1 packet 154 3.9
Milk, low-fat, fortified with vitamin D 8 ounces 98 2.5
Orange juice, fortified with vitamin D 8 ounces 100 2.5
Cereal, fortified 1 serving (usually 1 cup) 40-50 1.0-1.3
Egg yolk 1 large 37 0.9


Most vitamin D supplements available without a prescription contain cholecalciferol (vitamin D3). Multivitamin supplements generally provide 400-1,000 IU (10-25 μg) of vitamin D2 or vitamin D3. Single ingredient vitamin D supplements may provide 400 to 50,000 IU of vitamin D3, but 400 IU is the most commonly available dose (54). Bolus doses of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) may not always be as effective as vitamin D3 in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels; however, daily supplementation with vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 is equally effective (231). A number of calcium supplements may also provide vitamin D.



Vitamin D toxicity (hypervitaminosis D) has not been observed to result from sun exposure. The reason is that excessive sunlight exposure generates a number of biologically inert photoproducts from 7-dehydrocholesterol and cholecalciferol (3). Vitamin D toxicity induces abnormally high serum calcium levels (hypercalcemia), which could result in bone loss, kidney stones, and calcification of organs like the heart and kidneys if untreated over a long period of time. Hypercalcemia has been observed following daily doses of greater than 50,000 IU of vitamin D (232). Overall, research suggests that vitamin D toxicity is very unlikely in healthy people at intake levels lower than 10,000 IU/day (233-235). However, the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine conservatively set the tolerable upper intake level (UL) at 4,000 IU/day (100 μg/day) for all adults (Table 3). Certain medical conditions can increase the risk of hypercalcemia in response to vitamin D, including primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and lymphoma (233). People with these conditions may develop hypercalcemia in response to any increase in vitamin D nutrition and should consult a qualified health care provider regarding any increase in vitamin D intake.

Table 3. Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for Vitamin D
Age Group μg/day IU/day
Infants 0-6 months  25 1,000
Infants 6-12 months  37.5 1,500
Children 1-3 years  62.5 2,500
Children 4-8 years  75 3,000
Children 9-13 years  100 4,000
Adolescents 14-18 years  100 4,000
Adults 19 years and older  100 4,000

Drug interactions

The following medications increase the metabolism of vitamin D and may decrease serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: phenytoin (Dilantin), fosphenytoin (Cerebyx), phenobarbital (Luminal), carbamazepine (Tegretol), and rifampin (Rimactane) (6). The following medications should not be taken at the same time as vitamin D because they can decrease the intestinal absorption of vitamin D: cholestyramine (Questran), colestipol (Colestid), orlistat (Xenical), and mineral oil (236, 237). The oral anti-fungal medication, ketoconazole, inhibits the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase enzyme and has been found to reduce serum levels of 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D in healthy men (238). The Endocrine Society also recommends monitoring vitamin D status of patients on glucocorticoids and HIV treatment drugs because these medications increase the catabolism of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (36). The use of some cytostatic agents (cell growth inhibitors) may also increase the degradation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D in cancer patients under chemotherapy (6). The induction of hypercalcemia by toxic levels of vitamin D may precipitate cardiac arrhythmia in patients on digitalis (Digoxin) (239, 240).

Linus Pauling Institute Recommendation

The Linus Pauling Institute recommends that generally healthy adults take 2,000 IU (50 μg) of supplemental vitamin D daily. Most multivitamins contain 400 IU of vitamin D, and single ingredient vitamin D supplements are available for additional supplementation. Sun exposure, diet, skin color, and body mass index (BMI) have variable, substantial impact on body vitamin D levels. To adjust for individual differences and ensure adequate body vitamin D status, the Linus Pauling Institute recommends aiming for a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of at least 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L). Observational studies suggest that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between 30 ng/mL and 60 ng/mL are associated with lower risks of adverse health outcomes, including cancers and autoimmune diseases.

Infants should have a daily intake of 400 to 1,000 IU (10 to 25 μg) of vitamin D, and children and adolescents should have a daily intake of 600 to 1,000 IU (15 to 25 μg) of vitamin D, consistent with the recommendations of The Endocrine Society (36). Given the average vitamin D content of breast milk, infant formula, and the diets of children and adolescents, supplementation may be necessary to meet these recommendations. The American Academy of Pediatrics currently suggests that all infants, children, and adolescents receive 400 IU of supplemental vitamin D daily (19).

Older adults (>50 years)

Daily supplementation with 2,000 IU (50 μg) of vitamin D is especially important for older adults because aging is associated with a reduced capacity to synthesize vitamin D in the skin upon sun exposure.

Authors and Reviewers

Originally written in 2000 by:
Jane Higdon, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in March 2003 by:
Jane Higdon, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in March 2004 by:
Jane Higdon, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in January 2008 by:
Victoria J. Drake, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Updated in July 2014 by:
Barbara Delage, Ph.D.
Linus Pauling Institute
Oregon State University

Reviewed in November 2014 by:
Adrian F. Gombart
Principal Investigator, Linus Pauling Institute
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Oregon State University

The 2014 update of this article was underwritten, in part, by a grant from Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Copyright 2000-2017  Linus Pauling Institute


1.  Holick MF. Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(3):362-371.  (PubMed)

2.  Bikle DD. Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Chem Biol. 2014;21(3):319-329.  (PubMed)

3.  Volmer DA, Mendes LR, Stokes CS. Analysis of vitamin D metabolic markers by mass spectrometry: Current techniques, limitations of the "gold standard" method, and anticipated future directions. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2015;34(1):2-23.  (PubMed)

4.  Holick MF. Vitamin D: A millenium perspective. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(2):296-307.  (PubMed)

5.  Sutton AL, MacDonald PN. Vitamin D: more than a "bone-a-fide" hormone. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17(5):777-791.  (PubMed)

6.  Grober U, Spitz J, Reichrath J, Kisters K, Holick MF. Vitamin D: Update 2013: From rickets prophylaxis to general preventive healthcare. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5(3):331-347.  (PubMed)

7.  DeLuca HF. Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(6 Suppl):1689S-1696S.  (PubMed)

8.  Fukumoto S. Phosphate metabolism and vitamin D. Bonekey Rep. 2014;3:497.  (PubMed)

9.  Lin R, White JH. The pleiotropic actions of vitamin D. Bioessays. 2004;26(1):21-28.  (PubMed)

10.  Edfeldt K, Liu PT, Chun R, et al. T-cell cytokines differentially control human monocyte antimicrobial responses by regulating vitamin D metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(52):22593-22598.  (PubMed)

11.  Smolders J, Thewissen M, Damoiseaux J. Control of T cell activation by vitamin D. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(1):3; author reply 3-4.  (PubMed)

12.  Aranow C. Vitamin D and the immune system. J Investig Med. 2011;59(6):881-886.  (PubMed)

13.  Zeitz U, Weber K, Soegiarto DW, Wolf E, Balling R, Erben RG. Impaired insulin secretory capacity in mice lacking a functional vitamin D receptor. FASEB J. 2003;17(3):509-511.  (PubMed)

14.  Bourlon PM, Billaudel B, Faure-Dussert A. Influence of vitamin D3 deficiency and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 on de novo insulin biosynthesis in the islets of the rat endocrine pancreas. J Endocrinol. 1999;160(1):87-95.  (PubMed)

15.  Heer M, Egert S. Nutrients other than carbohydrates: their effects on glucose homeostasis in humans. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(1):14-35.  (PubMed)

16.  Sheng H-W. Sodium, chloride and potassium. In: Stipanuk M, ed. Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Human Nutrition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000:686-710.

17.  Sigmund CD. Regulation of renin expression and blood pressure by vitamin D(3). J Clin Invest. 2002;110(2):155-156.  (PubMed)

18.  Li YC, Kong J, Wei M, Chen ZF, Liu SQ, Cao LP. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) is a negative endocrine regulator of the renin-angiotensin system. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(2):229-238.  (PubMed)

19.  Wagner CL, Greer FR, and the Section on Breastfeeding and Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):1142-1152.  (PubMed).

20.  Goldacre M, Hall N, Yeates DG. Hospitalisation for children with rickets in England: a historical perspective. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):597-598.  (PubMed)

21.  Jones AN, Hansen KE. Recognizing the musculoskeletal manifestations of vitamin D deficiency. J Musculoskelet Med. 2009;26(10):389-396.  (PubMed)

22.  Bringhurst FR, Demay MB, Kronenberg HM. Mineral Metabolism. In: Larson PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, eds. Larsen: Williams Textbook of Endocrinology: Elsevier; 2003:1317-1320.

23.  Plotnikoff GA, Quigley JM. Prevalence of severe hypovitaminosis D in patients with persistent, nonspecific musculoskeletal pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(12):1463-1470.  (PubMed)

24.  Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):658-668.  (PubMed)

25.  Cooper JD, Smyth DJ, Walker NM, et al. Inherited variation in vitamin D genes is associated with predisposition to autoimmune disease type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2011;60(5):1624-1631.  (PubMed)

26.  Webb AR, Kline L, Holick MF. Influence of season and latitude on the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3: exposure to winter sunlight in Boston and Edmonton will not promote vitamin D3 synthesis in human skin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67(2):373-378.  (PubMed)

27.  Nichols EK, Khatib IM, Aburto NJ, et al. Vitamin D status and determinants of deficiency among non-pregnant Jordanian women of reproductive age. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(6):751-756.  (PubMed)

28.  Bassil D, Rahme M, Hoteit M, Fuleihan Gel H. Hypovitaminosis D in the Middle East and North Africa: Prevalence, risk factors and impact on outcomes. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5(2):274-298.  (PubMed)

29.  Balk SJ, Council on Environmental Health, Section on Dermatology. Ultraviolet radiation: a hazard to children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e791-817.  (PubMed)

30.  Dawodu A, Tsang RC. Maternal vitamin D status: effect on milk vitamin D content and vitamin D status of breastfeeding infants. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(3):353-361.  (PubMed)

31.  Thiele DK, Senti JL, Anderson CM. Maternal vitamin D supplementation to meet the needs of the breastfed infant: a systematic review. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(2):163-170.  (PubMed)

32.  Wharton B, Bishop N. Rickets. Lancet. 2003;362(9393):1389-1400.  (PubMed)

33.  Chen TC, Chimeh F, Lu Z, et al. Factors that influence the cutaneous synthesis and dietary sources of vitamin D. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;460(2):213-217.  (PubMed)

34.  Ginde AA, Liu MC, Camargo CA, Jr. Demographic differences and trends of vitamin D insufficiency in the US population, 1988-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(6):626-632.  (PubMed)

35.  Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein and vitamin D status of black Americans and white Americans. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):1991-2000.  (PubMed)

36.  Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911-1930.  (PubMed)

37.  Harris SS, Soteriades E, Coolidge JA, Mudgal S, Dawson-Hughes B. Vitamin D insufficiency and hyperparathyroidism in a low income, multiracial, elderly population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4125-4130.  (PubMed)

38.  Allain TJ, Dhesi J. Hypovitaminosis D in older adults. Gerontology. 2003;49(5):273-278.  (PubMed)

39.  Doorenbos CR, van den Born J, Navis G, de Borst MH. Possible renoprotection by vitamin D in chronic renal disease: beyond mineral metabolism. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2009;5(12):691-700.  (PubMed)

40.  Pappa HM, Bern E, Kamin D, Grand RJ. Vitamin D status in gastrointestinal and liver disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24(2):176-183.  (PubMed)

41.  Jahnsen J, Falch JA, Mowinckel P, Aadland E. Vitamin D status, parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(2):192-199.  (PubMed)

42.  Arunabh S, Pollack S, Yeh J, Aloia JF. Body fat content and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(1):157-161.  (PubMed)

43.  Gallagher JC, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25(OH)D in thin and obese women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;136:195-200.  (PubMed)

44.  Deng X, Song Y, Manson JE, et al. Magnesium, vitamin D status and mortality: results from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001 to 2006 and NHANES III. BMC Med. 2013;11:187.  (PubMed)

45.  Chapuy MC, Preziosi P, Maamer M, et al. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(5):439-443.  (PubMed)

46.  Thomas MK, Lloyd-Jones DM, Thadhani RI, et al. Hypovitaminosis D in medical inpatients. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(12):777-783.  (PubMed)

47.  Heaney RP, Dowell MS, Hale CA, Bendich A. Calcium absorption varies within the reference range for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Am Coll Nutr. 2003;22(2):142-146.  (PubMed)

48.  Valcour A, Blocki F, Hawkins DM, Rao SD. Effects of age and serum 25-OH-vitamin D on serum parathyroid hormone levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(11):3989-3995.  (PubMed)

49.  Ginde AA, Wolfe P, Camargo CA, Jr., Schwartz RS. Defining vitamin D status by secondary hyperparathyroidism in the US population. J Endocrinol Invest. 2012;35(1):42-48.  (PubMed)

50.  Gallagher JC, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. The effect of vitamin D on calcium absorption in older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(10):3550-3556.  (PubMed)

51.  Looker AC, Johnson CL, Lacher DA, Pfeiffer CM, Schleicher RL, Sempos CT. Vitamin D status: United States, 2001-2006. NCHS Data Brief. 2011(59):1-8.  (PubMed)

52.  Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.  (The National Academies Press)

53.  Mithal A, Wahl DA, Bonjour JP, et al. Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(11):1807-1820.  (PubMed)

54.  Wacker M, Holick MF. Vitamin D - effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation. Nutrients. 2013;5(1):111-148.  (PubMed)

55.  Lips P, Hosking D, Lippuner K, et al. The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy amongst women with osteoporosis: an international epidemiological investigation. J Intern Med. 2006;260(3):245-254.  (PubMed)

56.  Torbergsen AC, Watne LO, Wyller TB, et al. Vitamin K1 and 25(OH)D are independently and synergistically associated with a risk for hip fracture in an elderly population: A case control study. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(1):101-106.  (PubMed)

57.  Lips P, van Schoor NM. The effect of vitamin D on bone and osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(4):585-591.  (PubMed)

58.  Feskanich D, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Calcium, vitamin D, milk consumption, and hip fractures: a prospective study among postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(2):504-511.  (PubMed)

59.  Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(7):669-683.  (PubMed)

60.  Gurney EP, Nachtigall MJ, Nachtigall LE, Naftolin F. The Women's Health Initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later: a clinician's view. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;142:4-11.  (PubMed)

61.  Grant AM, Avenell A, Campbell MK, et al. Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9471):1621-1628.  (PubMed)

62.  Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(1):18-28.  (PubMed)

63.  Chung M, Lee J, Terasawa T, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for prevention of cancer and fractures: an updated meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(12):827-838.  (PubMed)

64.  Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Orav EJ, et al. A pooled analysis of vitamin D dose requirements for fracture prevention. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):40-49.  (PubMed)

65.  Avenell A, Mak JC, O'Connell D. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD000227.  (PubMed)

66.  Reid IR, Bolland MJ, Grey A. Effects of vitamin D supplements on bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):146-155.  (PubMed)

67.  Rosen CJ. Vitamin D supplementation: bones of contention. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):108-110.  (PubMed)

68.  Mocanu V, Vieth R. Three-year follow-up of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and bone mineral density in nursing home residents who had received 12 months of daily bread fortification with 125 mug of vitamin D3. Nutr J. 2013;12:137.  (PubMed)

69.  Boonen S, Lips P, Bouillon R, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vanderschueren D, Haentjens P. Need for additional calcium to reduce the risk of hip fracture with vitamin d supplementation: evidence from a comparative metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(4):1415-1423.  (PubMed)

70.  Grant WB. Update on evidence that support a role of solar ultraviolet-B irradiance in reducing cancer risk. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2013;13(1):140-146.  (PubMed)

71.  Yin L, Ordonez-Mena JM, Chen T, Schottker B, Arndt V, Brenner H. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum concentration and total cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2013;57(6):753-764.  (PubMed)

72.  Raimondi S, Johansson H, Maisonneuve P, Gandini S. Review and meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(7):1170-1180.  (PubMed)

73.  Gombart AF, Luong QT, Koeffler HP. Vitamin D compounds: activity against microbes and cancer. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(4A):2531-2542.  (PubMed)

74.  Thorne J, Campbell MJ. The vitamin D receptor in cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67(2):115-127.  (PubMed)

75.  Garland CF, Garland FC, Gorham ED. Calcium and vitamin D. Their potential roles in colon and breast cancer prevention. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;889:107-119.  (PubMed)

76.  Gandini S, Boniol M, Haukka J, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and colorectal, breast and prostate cancer and colorectal adenoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(6):1414-1424.  (PubMed)

77.  Ma Y, Zhang P, Wang F, Yang J, Liu Z, Qin H. Association between vitamin D and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3775-3782.  (PubMed)

78.  Touvier M, Chan DS, Lau R, et al. Meta-analyses of vitamin D intake, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(5):1003-1016.  (PubMed)

79.  Peters U, μglynn KA, Chatterjee N, et al. Vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin D receptor polymorphism in colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10(12):1267-1274.  (PubMed)

80.  Holt PR, Arber N, Halmos B, et al. Colonic epithelial cell proliferation decreases with increasing levels of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(1):113-119.  (PubMed)

81.  Lee JE. Circulating levels of vitamin D, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis. Nutr Res Pract. 2011;5(5):464-470.  (PubMed)

82.  Cauley JA, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and health outcomes five years after active intervention ended: the Women's Health Initiative. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22(11):915-929.  (PubMed)

83.  Holick MF. Calcium plus vitamin D and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(21):2287-2288; author reply 2287-2288.  (PubMed)

84.  Gorham ED, Garland CF, Garland FC, et al. Optimal vitamin D status for colorectal cancer prevention: a quantitative meta analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(3):210-216.  (PubMed)

85.  Maalmi H, Ordonez-Mena JM, Schottker B, Brenner H. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and survival in colorectal and breast cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(8):1510-1521.  (PubMed)

86.  Mohr SB, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Grant WB, Garland FC. Relationship between low ultraviolet B irradiance and higher breast cancer risk in 107 countries. Breast J. 2008;14(3):255-260.  (PubMed)

87.  John EM, Schwartz GG, Dreon DM, Koo J. Vitamin D and breast cancer risk: the NHANES I Epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971-1975 to 1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8(5):399-406.  (PubMed)

88.  Shin MH, Holmes MD, Hankinson SE, Wu K, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Intake of dairy products, calcium, and vitamin d and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(17):1301-1311.  (PubMed)

89.  Mohr SB, Gorham ED, Alcaraz JE, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and prevention of breast cancer: pooled analysis. Anticancer Res. 2011;31(9):2939-2948.  (PubMed)

90.  Wang D, Velez de-la-Paz OI, Zhai JX, Liu DW. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(6):3509-3517.  (PubMed)

91.  Wang J, He Q, Shao YG, Ji M, Bao W. Associations between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(6):3823-3830.  (PubMed)

92.  Ditsch N, Toth B, Mayr D, et al. The association between vitamin D receptor expression and prolonged overall survival in breast cancer. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60(2):121-129.  (PubMed)

93.  Rose AA, Elser C, Ennis M, Goodwin PJ. Blood levels of vitamin D and early stage breast cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(3):331-339.  (PubMed)

94.  Sperati F, Vici P, Maugeri-Sacca M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and breast cancer prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69269.  (PubMed)

95.  Gilbert R, Martin RM, Beynon R, et al. Associations of circulating and dietary vitamin D with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(3):319-340.  (PubMed)

96.  van der Rhee H, Coebergh JW, de Vries E. Is prevention of cancer by sun exposure more than just the effect of vitamin D? A systematic review of epidemiological studies. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1422-1436.  (PubMed)

97.  Tuohimaa P, Tenkanen L, Ahonen M, et al. Both high and low levels of blood vitamin D are associated with a higher prostate cancer risk: a longitudinal, nested case-control study in the Nordic countries. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(1):104-108.  (PubMed)

98.  Ahn J, Peters U, Albanes D, et al. Serum vitamin D concentration and prostate cancer risk: a nested case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(11):796-804.  (PubMed)

99.  Prescott J, Bertrand KA, Poole EM, Rosner BA, Tworoger SS. Surrogates of long-term vitamin d exposure and ovarian cancer risk in two prospective cohort studies. Cancers (Basel). 2013;5(4):1577-1600.  (PubMed)

100.  Gandini S, Raimondi S, Gnagnarella P, Dore JF, Maisonneuve P, Testori A. Vitamin D and skin cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(4):634-641.  (PubMed)

101.  Deluca HF, Cantorna MT. Vitamin D: its role and uses in immunology. FASEB J. 2001;15(14):2579-2585.  (PubMed)

102.  Agmon-Levin N, Mosca M, Petri M, Shoenfeld Y. Systemic lupus erythematosus one disease or many? Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11(8):593-595.  (PubMed)

103.  Goodin DS. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: insights to disease pathogenesis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;122:231-266.  (PubMed)

104.  Littorin B, Blom P, Scholin A, et al. Lower levels of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D among young adults at diagnosis of autoimmune type 1 diabetes compared with control subjects: results from the nationwide Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS). Diabetologia. 2006;49(12):2847-2852.  (PubMed)

105.  Pozzilli P, Manfrini S, Crino A, et al. Low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Horm Metab Res. 2005;37(11):680-683.  (PubMed)

106.  Raab J, Giannopoulou EZ, Schneider S, et al. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pre-type 1 diabetes and its association with disease progression. Diabetologia. 2014;57(5):902-908.  (PubMed)

107.  Hypponen E, Laara E, Reunanen A, Jarvelin MR, Virtanen SM. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9292):1500-1503.  (PubMed)

108.  Sorensen IM, Joner G, Jenum PA, Eskild A, Torjesen PA, Stene LC. Maternal serum levels of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D during pregnancy and risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring. Diabetes. 2012;61(1):175-178.  (PubMed)

109.  Brekke HK, Ludvigsson J. Vitamin D supplementation and diabetes-related autoimmunity in the ABIS study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8(1):11-14.  (PubMed)

110.  Fronczak CM, Baron AE, Chase HP, et al. In utero dietary exposures and risk of islet autoimmunity in children. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3237-3242.  (PubMed)

111.  Marjamaki L, Niinisto S, Kenward MG, et al. Maternal intake of vitamin D during pregnancy and risk of advanced β cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes in offspring. Diabetologia. 2010;53(8):1599-1607.  (PubMed)

112.  Miettinen ME, Reinert L, Kinnunen L, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level during early pregnancy and type 1 diabetes risk in the offspring. Diabetologia. 2012;55(5):1291-1294.  (PubMed)

113.  Smolders J, Thewissen M, Peelen E, et al. Vitamin D status is positively correlated with regulatory T cell function in patients with multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6635.  (PubMed)

114.  Staples J, Ponsonby AL, Lim L. Low maternal exposure to ultraviolet radiation in pregnancy, month of birth, and risk of multiple sclerosis in offspring: longitudinal analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c1640.  (PubMed)

115.  Bjornevik K, Riise T, Casetta I, et al. Sun exposure and multiple sclerosis risk in Norway and Italy: The EnvIMS study. Mult Scler. 2014; 20(8):1042-1049.  (PubMed)

116.  McDowell TY, Amr S, Culpepper WJ, et al. Sun exposure, vitamin D and age at disease onset in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;36(1):39-45.  (PubMed)

117.  Munger KL, Levin LI, Hollis BW, Howard NS, Ascherio A. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2006;296(23):2832-2838.  (PubMed)

118.  Munger KL, Zhang SM, O'Reilly E, et al. Vitamin D intake and incidence of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004;62(1):60-65.  (PubMed)

119.  Kampman MT, Steffensen LH, Mellgren SI, Jorgensen L. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on relapses, disease progression, and measures of function in persons with multiple sclerosis: exploratory outcomes from a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2012;18(8):1144-1151.  (PubMed)

120.  Soilu-Hanninen M, Aivo J, Lindstrom BM, et al. A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial with vitamin D3 as an add on treatment to interferon β-1b in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(5):565-571.  (PubMed)

121.  Ascherio A, Munger KL, White R, et al. Vitamin D as an early predictor of multiple sclerosis activity and progression. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(3):306-314.  (PubMed)

122.  Bruce D, Whitcomb JP, August A, McDowell MA, Cantorna MT. Elevated non-specific immunity and normal Listeria clearance in young and old vitamin D receptor knockout mice. Int Immunol. 2009;21(2):113-122.  (PubMed)

123.  Zwerina K, Baum W, Axmann R, et al. Vitamin D receptor regulates TNF-mediated arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(6):1122-1129.  (PubMed)

124.  Hitchon CA, Sun Y, Robinson DB, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphism rs2228570 (Fok1) is associated with rheumatoid arthritis in North American natives. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(9):1792-1797.  (PubMed)

125.  Lee YH, Bae SC, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG. Associations between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(6):3643-3651.  (PubMed)

126.  Mosaad YM, Hammad EM, Fawzy Z, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism as possible risk factor in rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatoid related osteoporosis. Hum Immunol. 2014;75(5):452-461.  (PubMed)

127.  Zanetti M, Harris SS, Dawson-Hughes B. Ability of vitamin D to reduce inflammation in adults without acute illness. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(2):95-98.  (PubMed)

128.  Merlino LA, Curtis J, Mikuls TR, Cerhan JR, Criswell LA, Saag KG. Vitamin D intake is inversely associated with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Iowa Women's Health Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(1):72-77.  (PubMed)

129.  Costenbader KH, Feskanich D, Holmes M, Karlson EW, Benito-Garcia E. Vitamin D intake and risks of systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis in women. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(4):530-535.  (PubMed)

130.  Hiraki LT, Munger KL, Costenbader KH, Karlson EW. Dietary intake of vitamin D during adolescence and risk of adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(12):1829-1836.  (PubMed)

131.  Sen D, Ranganathan P. Vitamin D in rheumatoid arthritis: panacea or placebo? Discov Med. 2012;14(78):311-319.  (PubMed)

132.  Hansen KE, Bartels CM, Gangnon RE, Jones AN, Gogineni J. An evaluation of high-dose vitamin D for rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2014;20(2):112-114.  (PubMed)

133.  Gonzalez LA, Toloza SM, μgwin G, Jr., Alarcon GS. Ethnicity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): its influence on susceptibility and outcomes. Lupus. 2013;22(12):1214-1224.  (PubMed)

134.  Hsieh CC, Lin BF. Dietary factors regulate cytokines in murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2011;11(1):22-27.  (PubMed)

135.  Mao S, Huang S. Association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI, FokI, ApaI and TaqI polymorphisms and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(3):381-388.  (PubMed)

136.  Monticielo OA, Teixeira Tde M, Chies JA, Brenol JC, Xavier RM. Vitamin D and polymorphisms of VDR gene in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31(10):1411-1421.  (PubMed)

137.  Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Olivares N, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, Aguirre C. Vitamin D deficiency in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, predictors and clinical consequences. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(6):920-923.  (PubMed)

138.  Toloza SM, Cole DE, Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB. Vitamin D insufficiency in a large female SLE cohort. Lupus. 2010;19(1):13-19.  (PubMed)

139.  Amital H, Szekanecz Z, Szucs G, et al. Serum concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are inversely related to disease activity: is it time to routinely supplement patients with SLE with vitamin D? Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(6):1155-1157.  (PubMed)

140.  Terrier B, Derian N, Schoindre Y, et al. Restoration of regulatory and effector T cell balance and B cell homeostasis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients through vitamin D supplementation. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(5):R221.  (PubMed)

141.  Cutillas-Marco E, Marquina-Vila A, Grant W, Vilata-Corell J, Morales-Suarez-Varela M. Vitamin D and cutaneous lupus erythematosus: effect of vitamin D replacement on disease severity. Lupus. 2014; [Epub ahead of print].  (PubMed)

142.  Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S, Helmii M. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory and hemostatic markers and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(3):265-272.  (PubMed)

143.  Schneider L, Dos Santos AS, Santos M, da Silva Chakr RM, Monticielo OA. Vitamin D and systemic lupus erythematosus: state of the art. Clin Rheumatol. 2014; 33(8):1033-1038.  (PubMed)

144.  Antico A, Tampoia M, Tozzoli R, Bizzaro N. Can supplementation with vitamin D reduce the risk or modify the course of autoimmune diseases? A systematic review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12(2):127-136.  (PubMed)

145.  Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008;117(4):503-511.  (PubMed)

146.  van Ballegooijen AJ, Kestenbaum B, Sachs MC, et al. Association of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone With Incident Hypertension: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1214-1222.  (PubMed)

147.  Kunutsor SK, Apekey TA, Steur M. Vitamin D and risk of future hypertension: meta-analysis of 283,537 participants. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(3):205-221.  (PubMed)

148.  Burgaz A, Orsini N, Larsson SC, Wolk A. Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2011;29(4):636-645.  (PubMed)

149.  Moody WE, Edwards NC, Madhani M, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease in early-stage chronic kidney disease: cause or association? Atherosclerosis. 2012;223(1):86-94.  (PubMed)

150.  Chitalia N, Recio-Mayoral A, Kaski JC, Banerjee D. Vitamin D deficiency and endothelial dysfunction in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220(1):265-268.  (PubMed)

151.  Chitalia N, Ismail T, Tooth L, et al. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on arterial vasomotion, stiffness and endothelial biomarkers in chronic kidney disease patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91363.  (PubMed)

152.  Messa P, Curreri M, Regalia A, Alfieri CM. Vitamin D and the cardiovascular system: an overview of the recent literature. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014;14(1):1-14.  (PubMed)

153.  Mao PJ, Zhang C, Tang L, et al. Effect of calcium or vitamin D supplementation on vascular outcomes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(2):106-111.  (PubMed)

154.  Camargo CA, Jr. Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: time for large randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(14):1442-1444.  (PubMed)

155.  Thomas GN, o Hartaigh B, Bosch JA, et al. Vitamin D levels predict all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in subjects with the metabolic syndrome: the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) Study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(5):1158-1164.  (PubMed)

156. Chiu KC, Chu A, Go VL, Saad MF. Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and β cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(5):820-825.  (PubMed)

157.  Shankar A, Sabanayagam C, Kalidindi S. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and prediabetes among subjects free of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(5):1114-1119.  (PubMed)

158.  Deleskog A, Hilding A, Brismar K, Hamsten A, Efendic S, Ostenson CG. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level predicts progression to type 2 diabetes in individuals with prediabetes but not with normal glucose tolerance. Diabetologia. 2012;55(6):1668-1678.  (PubMed)

159.  Khan H, Kunutsor S, Franco OH, Chowdhury R. Vitamin D, type 2 diabetes and other metabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72(1):89-97.  (PubMed)

160.  George PS, Pearson ER, Witham MD. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control and insulin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2012;29(8):e142-150.  (PubMed)

161.  Talaei A, Mohamadi M, Adgi Z. The effect of vitamin D on insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2013;5(1):8.  (PubMed)

162.  Gezen-Ak D, Yilmazer S, Dursun E. Why vitamin D in Alzheimer's disease? The hypothesis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(2):257-269.  (PubMed)

163.  Kalueff AV, Tuohimaa P. Neurosteroid hormone vitamin D and its utility in clinical nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007;10(1):12-19.  (PubMed)

164.  Annweiler C, Fantino B, Schott AM, Krolak-Salmon P, Allali G, Beauchet O. Vitamin D insufficiency and mild cognitive impairment: cross-sectional association. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(7):1023-1029.  (PubMed)

165.  Annweiler C, Schott AM, Rolland Y, Blain H, Herrmann FR, Beauchet O. Dietary intake of vitamin D and cognition in older women: a large population-based study. Neurology. 2010;75(20):1810-1816.  (PubMed)

166.  Hooshmand B, Lokk J, Solomon A, et al. Vitamin D in Relation to Cognitive Impairment, Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers, and Brain Volumes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(9):1132-1138.  (PubMed)

167.  Slinin Y, Paudel ML, Taylor BC, et al. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels and cognitive performance and decline in elderly men. Neurology. 2010;74(1):33-41.  (PubMed)

168.  Slinin Y, Paudel M, Taylor BC, et al. Association between serum 25(OH) vitamin D and the risk of cognitive decline in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(10):1092-1098.  (PubMed)

169.  Annweiler C, Rolland Y, Schott AM, et al. Higher vitamin D dietary intake is associated with lower risk of Alzheimer's disease: a 7-year follow-up. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(11):1205-1211.  (PubMed)

170.  Annweiler C, Allali G, Allain P, et al. Vitamin D and cognitive performance in adults: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(10):1083-1089.  (PubMed)

171.  Annweiler C, Llewellyn DJ, Beauchet O. Low serum vitamin D concentrations in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(3):659-674.  (PubMed)

172.  Balion C, Griffith LE, Strifler L, et al. Vitamin D, cognition, and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2012;79(13):1397-1405.  (PubMed)

173.  Lopes da Silva S, Vellas B, Elemans S, et al. Plasma nutrient status of patients with Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(4):485-502.  (PubMed)

174.  Annweiler C, Montero-Odasso M, Llewellyn DJ, Richard-Devantoy S, Duque G, Beauchet O. Meta-analysis of memory and executive dysfunctions in relation to vitamin D. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(1):147-171.  (PubMed)

175.  Annweiler C, Fantino B, Gautier J, Beaudenon M, Thiery S, Beauchet O. Cognitive effects of vitamin D supplementation in older outpatients visiting a memory clinic: a pre-post study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(4):793-795.  (PubMed)

176.  Stein MS, Scherer SC, Ladd KS, Harrison LC. A randomized controlled trial of high-dose vitamin D2 followed by intranasal insulin in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(3):477-484.  (PubMed)

177.  Annweiler C, Karras SN, Anagnostis P, Beauchet O. Vitamin D supplements: a novel therapeutic approach for Alzheimer patients. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:6.  (PubMed)

178.  Sato Y, Kikuyama M, Oizumi K. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and reduced bone mass in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1273-1278.  (PubMed)

179.  Evatt ML, Delong MR, Khazai N, Rosen A, Triche S, Tangpricha V. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in patients with Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(10):1348-1352.  (PubMed)

180.  Evatt ML, DeLong MR, Kumari M, et al. High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D status in patients with early Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(3):314-319.  (PubMed)

181.  Knekt P, Kilkkinen A, Rissanen H, Marniemi J, Saaksjarvi K, Heliovaara M. Serum vitamin D and the risk of Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(7):808-811.  (PubMed)

182.  Suzuki M, Yoshioka M, Hashimoto M, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in Parkinson disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(5):1004-1013.  (PubMed)

183.  Dobson R, Yarnall A, Noyce AJ, Giovannoni G. Bone health in chronic neurological diseases: a focus on multiple sclerosis and parkinsonian syndromes. Pract Neurol. 2013;13(2):70-79.  (PubMed)

184.  Torsney KM, Noyce AJ, Doherty KM, Bestwick JP, Dobson R, Lees AJ. Bone health in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(10):1159-66.  (PubMed)

185.  van den Bos F, Speelman AD, Samson M, Munneke M, Bloem BR, Verhaar HJ. Parkinson's disease and osteoporosis. Age Ageing. 2013;42(2):156-162.  (PubMed)

186.  Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Honda Y. Amelioration of osteoporosis and hypovitaminosis D by sunlight exposure in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011;17(1):22-26.  (PubMed)

187.  Aghajafari F, Nagulesapillai T, Ronksley PE, Tough SC, O'Beirne M, Rabi DM. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2013;346:f1169.  (PubMed)

188.  De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Ansary A, Kulier R, Pena-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD008873.  (PubMed)

189.  Thorne-Lyman A, Fawzi WW. Vitamin D during pregnancy and maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26 Suppl 1:75-90.  (PubMed)

190.  Maslova E, Hansen S, Jensen CB, Thorne-Lyman AL, Strom M, Olsen SF. Vitamin D intake in mid-pregnancy and child allergic disease - a prospective study in 44,825 Danish mother-child pairs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:199.  (PubMed)

191.  Wills AK, Shaheen SO, Granell R, Henderson AJ, Fraser WD, Lawlor DA. Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D and its association with childhood atopic outcomes and lung function. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(10):1180-1188.  (PubMed)

192.  Goldring ST, Griffiths CJ, Martineau AR, et al. Prenatal vitamin D supplementation and child respiratory health: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66627.  (PubMed)

193.  Weisse K, Winkler S, Hirche F, et al. Maternal and newborn vitamin D status and its impact on food allergy development in the German LINA cohort study. Allergy. 2013;68(2):220-228.  (PubMed)

194.  Alzaim M, Wood RJ. Vitamin D and gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(3):158-167.  (PubMed)

195.  Lacroix M, Battista MC, Doyon M, et al. Lower vitamin D levels at first trimester are associated with higher risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51(4):609-616.  (PubMed)

196.  Parlea L, Bromberg IL, Feig DS, Vieth R, Merman E, Lipscombe LL. Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in early pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):e25-32.  (PubMed)

197.  Poel YH, Hummel P, Lips P, Stam F, van der Ploeg T, Simsek S. Vitamin D and gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(5):465-469.  (PubMed)

198.  Asemi Z, Hashemi T, Karamali M, Samimi M, Esmaillzadeh A. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on glucose metabolism, lipid concentrations, inflammation, and oxidative stress in gestational diabetes: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(6):1425-1432.  (PubMed)

199.  Jelsma JG, van Poppel MN, Galjaard S, et al. DALI: Vitamin D and lifestyle intervention for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevention: an European multicentre, randomised trial - study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:142.  (PubMed)

200.  Makela MJ, Puhakka T, Ruuskanen O, et al. Viruses and bacteria in the etiology of the common cold. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(2):539-542.  (PubMed)

201.  Ginde AA, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA, Jr. Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and upper respiratory tract infection in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):384-390.  (PubMed)

202.  Murdoch DR, Slow S, Chambers ST, et al. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on upper respiratory tract infections in healthy adults: the VIDARIS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;308(13):1333-1339.  (PubMed)

203.  Bergman P, Lindh AU, Bjorkhem-Bergman L, Lindh JD. Vitamin D and Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65835.  (PubMed)

204.  Rees JR, Hendricks K, Barry EL, et al. Vitamin D3 supplementation and upper respiratory tract infections in a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(10):1384-1392.  (PubMed)

205.  Tran B, Armstrong BK, Ebeling PR, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on antibiotic use: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(1):156-161.  (PubMed)

206.  Grant CC, Kaur S, Waymouth E, et al. Reduced primary care respiratory infection visits following pregnancy and infancy vitamin D supplementation: a randomised controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(4):396-404.  (PubMed)

207.  Camargo CA, Jr., Manson JE. Vitamin D supplementation and risk of infectious disease: no easy answers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(1):3-4.  (PubMed)

208.  Mesquita Kde C, Igreja AC, Costa IM. Atopic dermatitis and vitamin D: facts and controversies. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88(6):945-953.  (PubMed)

209.  Lee SA, Hong S, Kim HJ, Lee SH, Yum HY. Correlation between serum vitamin D level and the severity of atopic dermatitis associated with food sensitization. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2013;5(4):207-210.  (PubMed)

210.  Javanbakht MH, Keshavarz SA, Djalali M, et al. Randomized controlled trial using vitamins E and D supplementation in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2011;22(3):144-150.  (PubMed)

211.  Amestejani M, Salehi BS, Vasigh M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a clinical trial study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(3):327-330.  (PubMed)

212.  Wat H, Dytoc M. Off-label uses of topical vitamin D in dermatology: a systematic review. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014;18(2):91-108.  (PubMed)

213.  Xue LN, Xu KQ, Zhang W, Wang Q, Wu J, Wang XY. Associations between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(1):54-60.  (PubMed)

214.  Ananthakrishnan AN, Khalili H, Higuchi LM, et al. Higher predicted vitamin D status is associated with reduced risk of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(3):482-489.  (PubMed)

215.  Jorgensen SP, Agnholt J, Glerup H, et al. Clinical trial: vitamin D3 treatment in Crohn's disease - a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(3):377-383.  (PubMed)

216.  Yang L, Weaver V, Smith JP, Bingaman S, Hartman TJ, Cantorna MT. Therapeutic effect of vitamin D supplementation in a pilot study of Crohn's patients. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2013;4:e33.  (PubMed)

217.  Anderson JL, May HT, Horne BD, et al. Relation of vitamin D deficiency to cardiovascular risk factors, disease status, and incident events in a general healthcare population. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(7):963-968.  (PubMed)

218.  Al Mheid I, Patel R, Murrow J, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with arterial stiffness and vascular dysfunction in healthy humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(2):186-192.  (PubMed)

219.  Krause R, Buhring M, Hopfenmuller W, Holick MF, Sharma AM. Ultraviolet B and blood pressure. Lancet. 1998;352(9129):709-710.  (PubMed)

220.  Kunutsor SK, Burgess S, Munroe PB, Khan H. Vitamin D and high blood pressure: causal association or epiphenomenon? Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(1):1-14.  (PubMed)

221.  Rostand SG. Ultraviolet light may contribute to geographic and racial blood pressure differences. Hypertension. 1997;30(2 Pt 1):150-156.  (PubMed)

222.  Forman JP, Scott JB, Ng K, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure in blacks. Hypertension. 2013;61(4):779-785.  (PubMed)

223.  Witham MD, Price RJ, Struthers AD, et al. Cholecalciferol treatment to reduce blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the VitDISH randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1672-1679.  (PubMed)

224.  Oz F, Cizgici AY, Oflaz H, et al. Impact of vitamin D insufficiency on the epicardial coronary flow velocity and endothelial function. Coron Artery Dis. 2013;24(5):392-397.  (PubMed)

225.  Shedeed SA. Vitamin D supplementation in infants with chronic congestive heart failure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33(5):713-719.  (PubMed)

226.  Boxer RS, Kenny AM, Schmotzer BJ, Vest M, Fiutem JJ, Pina IL. A randomized controlled trial of high dose vitamin D3 in patients with heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1(1):84-90.  (PubMed)

227.  Norman AW, Henry HH. Vitamin D. In: Bowman BA, Russell RM, eds. Present Knowledge in Nutrition. 9th ed. Washington, D.C.: ILSI Press; 2006:198-210.

228.  Holick MF. Vitamin D: the underappreciated D-lightful hormone that is important for skeletal and cellular health. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes; 2002;9:87-98.

229.  Terushkin V, Bender A, Psaty EL, Engelsen O, Wang SQ, Halpern AC. Estimated equivalency of vitamin D production from natural sun exposure versus oral vitamin D supplementation across seasons at two US latitudes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(6):929 e921-929.  (PubMed)

230.  Food and Nutrition Board, Insitute of Medicine. Vitamin D. Dietary Reference Intakes: Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1999:250-287.  (National Academy Press)

231.  Tripkovic L, Lambert H, Hart K, et al. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(6):1357-1364.  (PubMed)

232.  Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266-281.  (PubMed)

233.  Vieth R. Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(5):842-856.  (PubMed)

234.  Heaney RP, Davies KM, Chen TC, Holick MF, Barger-Lux MJ. Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(1):204-210.  (PubMed)

235.  Vieth R, Chan PC, MacFarlane GD. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(2):288-294.  (PubMed)

236.  Knodel LC, Talbert RL. Adverse effects of hypolipidaemic drugs. Med Toxicol. 1987;2(1):10-32.  (PubMed)

237.  McDuffie JR, Calis KA, Booth SL, Uwaifo GI, Yanovski JA. Effects of orlistat on fat-soluble vitamins in obese adolescents. Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22(7):814-822.  (PubMed)

238.  Glass AR, Eil C. Ketoconazole-induced reduction in serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63(3):766-769.  (PubMed)

239.  Hendler SS, Rorvik DR, eds. PDR for Nutritional Supplements. Montvale: Medical Economics Company, Inc; 2001.

240.  Vitamin D. Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database [Website]. December 3, 2007. Available at: Accessed 12/3/07.