Title | Sulforaphane Bioavailability and Chemopreventive Activity in Women Scheduled for Breast Biopsy. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2015 |
Authors | Atwell LL, Zhang Z, Mori M, Farris P, Vetto JT, Naik AM, Oh KY, Thuillier P, Ho E, Shannon J |
Journal | Cancer Prev Res (Phila) |
Volume | 8 |
Issue | 12 |
Pagination | 1184-1191 |
Date Published | 2015 Dec |
ISSN | 1940-6215 |
Keywords | Anticarcinogenic Agents, Biological Availability, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Chemoprevention, Dietary Supplements, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Isothiocyanates, Mass Spectrometry |
Abstract | Epidemiologic studies suggest a protective effect of cruciferous vegetables on breast cancer. Sulforaphane (SFN), an active food component derived from crucifers, has been shown to be effective in breast cancer chemoprevention. This study evaluated the chemopreventive effect of SFN on selective biomarkers from blood and breast tissues. In a 2- to 8-week double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 54 women with abnormal mammograms and scheduled for breast biopsy were randomized to consume a placebo or a glucoraphanin (GFN) supplement providing SFN (n = 27). Plasma and urinary SFN metabolites, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity, and tissue biomarkers (H3K18ac, H3K9ac, HDAC3, HDAC6, Ki-67, p21) were measured before and after the intervention in benign, ductal carcinoma in situ, or invasive ductal carcinoma breast tissues. Within the supplement group, Ki-67 (P = 0.003) and HDAC3 (P = 0.044) levels significantly decreased in benign tissue. Pre-to-postintervention changes in these biomarkers were not significantly different between treatment groups after multiple comparison adjustment. GFN supplementation was associated with a significant decrease in PBMC HDAC activity (P = 0.04). No significant associations were observed between SFN and examined tissue biomarkers when comparing treatment groups. This study provides evidence that GFN supplementation for a few weeks is safe but may not be sufficient for producing changes in breast tissue tumor biomarkers. Future studies employing larger sample sizes should evaluate alternative dosing and duration regimens to inform dietary SFN strategies in breast cancer chemoprevention. |
DOI | 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0119 |
Alternate Journal | Cancer Prev Res (Phila) |
PubMed ID | 26511489 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC4670794 |
Grant List | P01 CA090890 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States UL1 TR000128 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States R21 CA132236 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States R21 CA132236-01A2 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States P30 CA069533 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States P30 ES000210 / ES / NIEHS NIH HHS / United States |